I submit that there is no empirical evidence to support the assertion that any god exists. First round is acceptance only, second round is for arguments, third and fourth will be for rebuttal and additional argument with fifth for summary. Any evidence provided must originate in a peer-reviewed study that was NOT done by an organization backed by a religious group of any kind.
Definition: Empirical. Obtained by direct or indirect observation, falsifiable, and repeatable.
Since I am asserting there is no empirical evidence that any god, not just the Christian variety, exists, my first argument is actually a challenge. I am aware of all of the philosophical arguments for the existence of a Creator, which many choose to call god. They are not acceptable in this debate as the rules call for empirical evidence. I cannot refer to any evidence of that nature to challenge because there is none. All evidence of gods is entirely subjective, entirely untestable, and dependent entirely upon books written for the specific purpose of promoting a religious agenda of one sort or another.
Firstly i would like to apologize for not being on i have not had internet access. Thank you for waiting. I honestly dont know how to prove god is real but he does miracles every day to show us and he speaks to me.. and i know this is bias and opinions and im sorry i was not thinking about that when i sighned up for this sorry for wasting your debate.