The Instigator
EthyWoo
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Commondebator
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

There is not enough proof to say god exists.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Commondebator
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/14/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 462 times Debate No: 70033
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

EthyWoo

Pro

Round 1 is for acceptance
2-4 for debating

I will argue that there is not enough proof to safely say god exists.
My opponent will argue that there is in fact enough proof.

We are discussing Christianity.
I wish my opponent luck.
Commondebator

Con

I accept

I will be arguing how you do not need proof to declare that god exists.
Debate Round No. 1
EthyWoo

Pro

Okay then if you want to change the topic to "you don't not need proof to declare god exists" then you can make to opening argument
Commondebator

Con

I am not changing the topic

Anyway, getting to the argument, god is an eternal being and my opponent claims that there is not enough evidence/proof to declare god's existence. First of all, god does not contradict any of the scientific theories, so god is a plausible concept. God does not require evidence or proof since it is impossible to disprove god in the first place. Follow my logic

Person 1: God does exist
Person 2: I cannot see him
Person 1: He is invisible
Person 2: Well, I cannot detect him
Person 1: he is undetectable by any of or instraments.
Person 2: I Cannot sense him
Person 1: He is undetectable by our senses
Person 2: Therefore he does not exist
Person 2: He exists, simply undetectable by our senses

Person 1 has now created a situation and made a claim that god exists. His claim cannot be disproven therefore in person 1's perpective, god exists.

In fact, since energy cannot be created or destroyed, we can interpret that god is energy itself. It is really all about perpective therefore we do not need proof for god to exist. Therefore, there is proof to claim that god exists.
Debate Round No. 2
EthyWoo

Pro

EthyWoo forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
EthyWoo

Pro

EthyWoo forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by EthyWoo 2 years ago
EthyWoo
Shots fired! That one hurt XD wow
Posted by Longline 2 years ago
Longline
And there in not enough proves to say you are not a re....
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
EthyWooCommondebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by 16kadams 2 years ago
16kadams
EthyWooCommondebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF