There is parallel Universe for every difference
Debate Rounds (3)
As an introduction let me clarify my position:
I am so far not convinced of the existence of any kind of parallel universes and I hope The Instigator (Pro) will provide both evidence as well as a theory for his opinion.
My initial counter argument goes as follows:
Assuming determinism is true, there is logically only one outcome given a specific situation.
That is: "A" must always lead to "B", and can never lead to anything else. By using the word "always" I do not mean that situation "A" can occur multiple times or in multiple places. What I mean is that if one had the possibility to rewind time, "A" would never lead to anything else then "B".
Considering that assumption, even if there are multiple universes, they would all look the same. "A" would lead to "B" in every one of them.
I hope I didn't take the introduction too far. I am eager to read the arguments put forth by Pro.
but in another parallel universe it might be a->c
THAT IS WHAT I BELIEVE
Furthermore it seems in the reality you are describing, there would have to be an infinite amount of universes, and not only that. At every infinitely small period of time all of the infinite amount of universes would have to each(!) split up into an infinite amount of universes.
It seems the theory proposed by Pro implies an utterly absurd reality.
MasterManav forfeited this round.
if anyone else would like to debate this I would be glad to participate :)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the duty to prove his position. Con successfully provided a counter argument, and pro forfeited at the end, which I count as concession of arguments.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.