The Instigator
Con (against)
1 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

These pretzels are making me thirsty.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/14/2016 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 243 times Debate No: 93739
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




These pretzels are making me thirsty.


I'll punch you square in the face.
Debate Round No. 1


Pro has taken the Pro stance in this debate, and he must provide an argument to show that these pretzels are making me thirsty. I have no pretzels nor are pretzels present, thus Pro has quite an uphill climb to prove such a thing.

Seeing Pro has threatened me, conduct goes to Con.


Con to goes conduct, me threatened has Pro seeing.

Thing a such prove to climb uphill an quite has Pro thus, present pretzels are nor pretzels no have I. Thirsty me making are pretzels these that show to argument an provide must he and, debate this in stance Pro the taken has Pro.

Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Murdoc 3 months ago
Round 1 from Pro was, wtf, hilarious. I couldn't stop laughing. Follow the white rabbit.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ThinkBig 3 months ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro agrees that the conduct should go to con for threatening to punch him in the face. Neither side fulfilled their burden of proof and so the arguments are tied.