The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
greatkitteh
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

They who casteth the tho most votes, are the pharo, in their own pea brain.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
greatkitteh
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/14/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 419 times Debate No: 75317
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (2)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

So true. Accept it.
greatkitteh

Con

I accept, and choose to use this round as an acceptance round. BOP is on pro that People who vote are pharaohs, and their brains are pea.
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

You accepted, so please debate your opinion, I already stated mine. prove it wrong if you can. That's your assignment!
greatkitteh

Con

Hello, Today, I will argue that voters don`t have their brain made out of pea, and are not pharaohs.

First of all, Brains are made of nerve tissues, not pea. Cells, the things that make up your bodies, make tissues, a bunch of cells essentially working together. Tissues working together are called organs. Your brain is a organ. The tissues that work together in your brain are nerve tissues. Therefore, people who vote are NOT pea-brains, as peas are not nerve tissues.


Second of all, Pharaohs are Egyptian kings at ancient Egypt, and they don`t have brains. See, since all the Pharaohs are dead, and Egyptians Removed the brains of pharaohs after they die, they cannot have a brain, even if it is made out of pea. So, you cannot call pharaohs pea-brains, as they don`t have brains


Last of all, you said voters are pharaohs. You never specified how what kind of voters there are. Anyone who is 18 and a U.S. Citizen can vote in the presidential vote alone. 50-70% of those people do vote. This goes against what pharaohs are, there can only be one pharaoh in ancient Egypt. Therefore, voters are not pharaohs.


Also, if anything, the person running or the side in the debate would be a pharaoh, not the person voting for their side.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

Doctors, have not fixed the world yet, they have just effed it up more. I am extremely reluctant to trust a Dr. Go ahead matey, trust your prescription. Mullahs consider themselves Dr.'s bosses. So do priests. Sick effin world. You believe it. I believe, you do.
greatkitteh

Con

I disagree. Doctors never fixed the world, because Doctors aren`t supposed to fix it. The job goes to the mechanic. The mechanics Repair cars, therefore You`re argument that Doctors never fixed the world is invalid.

Some of the routine tasks for an automotive mechanic are road testing vehicles and using computers to test automotive systems and components. They repair or replace parts such as the fuel system, brakes, engine, drive train, air conditioning and heating, and exhaust. They also perform basic jobs like tune ups, oil changes and lubrications, but part of their job is fixing things,so Dcotors don`t fix the wolrd, mechanics fix things.

Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
I speak word salad, not a language of rigor and structure in honor of the regime.
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
Afraid, you will lose, or win unjustly?
Posted by ButterCatX 1 year ago
ButterCatX
I'm half tempted to accept just to troll it.
Posted by Reeseroni 1 year ago
Reeseroni
what
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
Word salad
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Kreakin 1 year ago
Kreakin
Max.WallacegreatkittehTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Easy noob snipe for Con, won in all areas.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
Max.WallacegreatkittehTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: