The Instigator
AngeloftheDawns
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Rosalie
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points

"Third Wave" Feminism

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Rosalie
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/30/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 824 times Debate No: 84395
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

AngeloftheDawns

Con

I propose that Third Wave Feminism is a load of sexist misandry. Many, if not all, modern feminist are only focused of women's issues and laugh at the idea that men have issues as well. I have personally witnessed to modern feminist laugh at a men who have been abused and raped just because they believe men cannot be abuse and/or raped. Also, modern feminism has placed women as the "more important and dominant" sex; however, this in itself is sexist. With this note, I end my proposal.
Rosalie

Pro

Thank you Con for starting this debate. I myself am a Radical feminsit, so this should be fun ;)

I will use this round as acceptance, and define some terms.

Third-Wave Feminism- Feminism portal. Third-wave feminism refers to several diverse strains of feminist activity and study, whose exact boundaries in the history of feminism are a subject of debate, but are generally marked as beginning in the early 1990s and continuing to the present. (https://www.google.com...)

Feminism- the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.


Con's claims are based off of assumptions, and personal evaluations. They claim that "I have personally witnessed to modern feminist laugh at a men who have been abused and raped just because they believe men cannot be abuse and/or raped."

Because of this claim, Con makes it seems as if *every feminist* thinks its fine for a man to be raped. In order for Con to win the debate, they must prove that *every feminist* belives in in-humane morals and actions such as rape. I look foward to their case!
Debate Round No. 1
AngeloftheDawns

Con

AngeloftheDawns forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
AngeloftheDawns

Con

AngeloftheDawns forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
AngeloftheDawns

Con

AngeloftheDawns forfeited this round.
Rosalie

Pro

Extended. Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: ResponsiblyIrresponsible// Mod action: NOT Removed<

4 points to Pro (Conduct, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: FF.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Full forfeit debates are not moderated.
************************************************************************
Posted by Rami 1 year ago
Rami
I'd wanted to debate against feminism.
Posted by Nivek 1 year ago
Nivek
Give your definitions, or it'll leave people like me confused.It's the internet, the audience doesn't read what you read. it would help for you to chip in what you mean.
Posted by Nivek 1 year ago
Nivek
The word you're looking at is liberal feminism, which is part of the second wave. To generalize it on third wave would be to attack radical feminism and it's proposal to abolish social status. Or to attack how 'Minority ethnicity' are irrelevant to the scope of equality, given the fair treatment of genders.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 1 year ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
AngeloftheDawnsRosalieTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 1 year ago
famousdebater
AngeloftheDawnsRosalieTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by kasmic 1 year ago
kasmic
AngeloftheDawnsRosalieTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfiets from con, pro's arguments stand at the end of the debate.