The Instigator
Renascor
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points
The Contender
cameronl35
Pro (for)
Losing
5 Points

This Debate is Pointless.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
Renascor
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/19/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,865 times Debate No: 19372
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (31)
Votes (8)

 

Renascor

Con

This debate is not pointless because after this debate, I will have voting rights. Ergo, this debate is not pointless.
cameronl35

Pro


pointless-devoid of meaning


debate-dispute between opposing parties


There is no dispute going on, therefore the debate is devoid of meaning. Even if he gets voting rights, the debate itself is pointless because there is no debate. What does have a point is that Juggle gives him rights he debated, pointlessly. That's a result of the debate, not the debate itself. Since he is not debating, then the debate has no meaning! It's crystal clear, vote PRO.



Debate Round No. 1
31 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Leftii 5 years ago
Leftii
How can such a pointless debate get so many comments?
Posted by EthanHuOnDebateOrg 5 years ago
EthanHuOnDebateOrg
It is pretty pointless, since Renascor is obviously an incompetent debater who only suggests such pointless resolutions with only 1 round... so. smd. (: jk, i love you, homedog.
Posted by cameronl35 5 years ago
cameronl35
Lol @ Chrysippus's semantic interpretation
Posted by cameronl35 5 years ago
cameronl35
Honestly it doesn't really matter to me anymore for I don't think any of the voters will care/change their mind
Posted by Renascor 5 years ago
Renascor
Your right it, it isnt. I think we should debate whether or not this debate was truly a debate.
Posted by cameronl35 5 years ago
cameronl35
No well Liquidus abruptly came and said "I'm talking about during the debate.", seeming to have finished your sentence. Then he goes on to say that he said "That you disagreed as well." which he never said..I'm not sure what's going on but I don't think this is relevant
Posted by Renascor 5 years ago
Renascor
@ Cameron, I dont understand what your saying. We both disagreed in the debate itself. And Liquidus had agreed with me moments before. Is seems that you have confused yourself.

I suggest that we did in fact disagree.
Posted by cameronl35 5 years ago
cameronl35
what? I'm confused lol..
Posted by Liquidus 5 years ago
Liquidus
Oh Im sorry. I though my original comment had come through. I had originally said "That you disagreed as well". I apologize.
Posted by cameronl35 5 years ago
cameronl35
are Liquidus and Renascor the same person?
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 5 years ago
Maikuru
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argues that there is no argument. If that were truly the case, he would have simply agreed with Con and had a better shot here.
Vote Placed by nfong 5 years ago
nfong
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision:
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to PRO for CON's abuse to get voting privileges. But this debate technically had a point.
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: i found this debate as a way to stop being bored, so it was not pointless to me
Vote Placed by Viper-King 5 years ago
Viper-King
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made a really good point !
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 5 years ago
Chrysippus
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con makes one point, Pro makes four. The resolution is negated. Conduct goes to Pro because the debate was set up for an easy win.
Vote Placed by 000ike 5 years ago
000ike
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I agree with Con. This does not necessarily have to fulfill its purpose as a debate in order to have meaning. In order for anything to have meaning it must have a significance to one of the parties involved, and as Pro proved, this debate allowed him to vote, hence its significance.
Vote Placed by Mr.Infidel 5 years ago
Mr.Infidel
Renascorcameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: See comments