The Instigator
9spaceking
Pro (for)
Losing
5 Points
The Contender
CJKAllstar
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

This Debate is Stupid

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
CJKAllstar
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/3/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 932 times Debate No: 51572
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

9spaceking

Pro

April Fools!
I'm not creative so...this again.
This debate is stupid. It is so stupid that I will forfeit the rounds, leaving the other debater talking to himself for the next 4 rounds. Also, he only has 5 minutes (and a 500 character limit) to prepare (and type up) for each round, not giving him enough time (and words to use) and giving him not a lot of experience. Finally, the voting period is only 3 days, giving everybody not enough time, and the consensus is not accurately reached.
Vote Pro
CJKAllstar

Con

"This debate is stupid"

Stupid - lacking intelligence or common sense.[1]

A debate is not capable of having common sense or intelligence thus is incapable of being stupid. Stupidity is a human idea in which we have not put on inanimate objects.

Sources:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...
Debate Round No. 1
9spaceking

Pro

9spaceking forfeited this round.
CJKAllstar

Con

You forfeiting the rounds does not prove the stupidity of this debate. If it does, then you have not met this BOP and I still have the upper edge. I am not talking to myself, but still addressing you so you were incorrect, and this is enough time for me to make all the points I need clear, and it is giving me experience as five minutes is the length of a BP style debate speech, so this is actually very useful. And as for he 3 days voting time, we only need to wait and see.
Debate Round No. 2
9spaceking

Pro

9spaceking forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
9spaceking

Pro

9spaceking forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
9spaceking

Pro

[insert a beautiful argument about neurophysiology and win over the voters with his wit and intellect.]
(reference to http://www.debate.org...)

Couldn't resist the temptation. :P
Nevertheless I will still not make an argument.
Thus con wins just by posting lame "vote for me" images (one of is too big), a single definition, and one point.
In conclusion this debate truly is stupid. (seriously, I made 3 debates based on this single topic. How dumb is that?
CJKAllstar

Con

CJKAllstar forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
or... the other guy from my reference was correct! Con lost interest and stopped debating, leaving me to post a "beautiful argument concerning neurophysiology" (even though I didn't.)
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
He forfeited the last round...too awe-struck?
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
u have a good point tho con. Next time, I'll make "This debate is pointless"
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
wow con is actually serious this time instead of pointing out how elaborate this debate was. Intriguing!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
Geogeer
9spacekingCJKAllstarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited the match.
Vote Placed by Demonsthenes 2 years ago
Demonsthenes
9spacekingCJKAllstarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:52 
Reasons for voting decision: Con loses points for just posting a picture, twice. Pro made it funny and more of a joke- it was just an April Fools prank. Con took it too seriously.
Vote Placed by MrJosh 2 years ago
MrJosh
9spacekingCJKAllstarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: CON's argument in R1 nailed it. Since PRO set the debate up in such a way that he could not rebut, pretty much any argument would win.