The Instigator
idebater
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
tmar19652
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points

This House believes that sports stars should have a maximum salary.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
tmar19652
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/7/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 938 times Debate No: 32179
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

idebater

Pro

Round 1 is for acceptance. New arguments can be introduced in rounds 2 and 3. Round 4 is reserved for rebuttals, extension of arguments and a final wrapping up. Round 5 is for reply.

Sources do not have to be cited for this debate.

I would like to thank my opponent in advance and look forward to a engaging, civilized debate.
tmar19652

Con

You have the complete burden of proof. Make your case.
Debate Round No. 1
idebater

Pro

idebater forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Con

I hope my opponent will make an appearance for their next round.
Debate Round No. 2
idebater

Pro

idebater forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Con

I hate these 5 round fofreits!! Anyway, vote con!
Debate Round No. 3
idebater

Pro

idebater forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Con

My opponent has not fulfilled their burden of proof.
Debate Round No. 4
idebater

Pro

idebater forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Con

Vote con!
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Misterscruffles 3 years ago
Misterscruffles
idebatertmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by 4saken 3 years ago
4saken
idebatertmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
idebatertmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments made, but dropping out without any statements counts against conduct IMO.
Vote Placed by Pennington 3 years ago
Pennington
idebatertmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF