The Instigator
MassiveDump
Pro (for)
Winning
17 Points
The Contender
thedon22
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

This Poem by MassiveDump is a Poem by MassiveDump

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
MassiveDump
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/3/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,024 times Debate No: 36323
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (6)

 

MassiveDump

Pro

Roses are red,
Tulips are too,
But Violets are Violet,
Not f*cking blue,

Roses are red,
Daisies are gold,
Violets are violet,
I have no soul,

Roses are red,
Gun's in my hand,
Take off your pants,
And get in the van,

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
No one debates poetry,
STFU.
thedon22

Con

Well I can definitely say this poem is a "massive dump". And that's not true whatsoever, many people debate poetry on this site. But you were dead on by saying that it's a poem by "massive dump", because it sounds like a massive dump.
Debate Round No. 1
MassiveDump

Pro

Typically, one negates the resolution.
thedon22

Con

Well you did say "no one debates poetry" and that is clearly false. I could show you multiple debates of people debating poetry. And as for your poem who knows who wrote it. I'm just saying that clearly it is a massive dump.
Debate Round No. 2
MassiveDump

Pro

That wasn't the resolution, the resolution was that this was a poem by MassiveDump. So far, you've conceded that it is.
thedon22

Con

No, not at all. We don't know exactly who wrote it. But I am definitely saying it was written by a massive dump because it is a massive dump. It probably isn't the real name of the person who wrote it though.
Debate Round No. 3
MassiveDump

Pro

My real name is MassiveDump and unless my opponent can prove otherwise in the next round, I have met my burden of proof.
thedon22

Con

Unless my opponent can prove his name is "massivedump" (which by the way is an odd name to give to your kid) then it stands we don't know who wrote the poem. But there is not a single registered child named "massivedump" so it would be impossible for a non-existent person to write such a poem. So no, he has not met his burden of proof because his burden of proof is non-existent. Thank you. I hope the voters will choose wisely.
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by AngelofDeath 2 years ago
AngelofDeath
@Noctan ikr :P
Posted by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
It has been mailed to your local walmart and for a small shipping fee to the cashier it will be yours for free.
Posted by Noctan 3 years ago
Noctan
@Massive I WANT MY PIECE OF CHEEZ
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
This needs to be opened up again, more people must see this poem.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Sargon 3 years ago
Sargon
MassiveDumpthedon22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Never mind.
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
MassiveDumpthedon22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con basicly agreed in Round 1 that it was a poem by MassiveDump.
Vote Placed by justin.graves 3 years ago
justin.graves
MassiveDumpthedon22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't understand what the hecky he was talking about. And for the love of Saint Lucy Patron Saint of the Blind... I hope he was trolling and not serious.
Vote Placed by InVinoVeritas 3 years ago
InVinoVeritas
MassiveDumpthedon22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con starts his argument in the last round, when it can't be responded to.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
MassiveDumpthedon22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's conclusion needed to be backed by a source... Really he should have properly trolled, and insisted the poem was the work of Edgar Allen Poe or something. As it was he tried to take poetry as if it were an argument onto itself, which in a deeper way it may be, but not in the mere words it's composed of.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
MassiveDumpthedon22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Resolution negated. But I am definitely saying it was written by a massive dump. Con