The Instigator
iAnonymous
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
THEBOMB
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points

This debate here doesn't exist.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
THEBOMB
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/19/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,083 times Debate No: 22157
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (5)

 

iAnonymous

Con

This, in here, debate does exist.
IT DOES EXIST.
IT DOES EXIST.
IT DOES EXIST.
IT DOES EXIST.
IT DOES EXIST.
IT DOES EXIST.
IT DOES EXIST.

Pro, my opponent, will argue that it doesn't.

I created this debate and I submitted this debate, therefore, this debate does exist.

This debate may not be "actual debate," but in Debate.org this debate is called a debate. Period.

Good luck, Pro.
THEBOMB

Pro

I define exist to mean in the geophysical universe and not residing in any one person's mind ie. it must exist both in my
opponents and my mind.

I cannot know with any certainty whether my opponent exists or not. Therefore, I cannot know with any certainty whether my opponent submitted this debate or if its just a product of my mind. My opponent must prove: 1) their existence outside of my mind and 2) prove they were the ones who submitted the debate. This debate does not exist.

Good luck.
Debate Round No. 1
iAnonymous

Con

"I cannot know with any certainty whether my opponent exists or not."

If I am not exist, then why and how am I here?
THEBOMB

Pro

You exist as a figment of my imagination until you prove otherwise. :D I cannot know with any certainty that you exist outside of my mind. Once again you must prove it.
Debate Round No. 2
iAnonymous

Con

Go and ask someone around you and bring them to this site and ask them if this debate in this site exists or not, they obviously will say yes. Once this debate is in their minds too, it is obvious that this debate does exist.
THEBOMB

Pro

But, they must prove their existence as well otherwise I cannot know they exist. Since I they have not proven their existence outside my mind then no seperate mind is percieving this debate. Therefore, the debate does not exist. The resolution has been upheld as I am the only one who with full certainty percieves this debate. According to the definition it takes two seperate entities. Both of whom have to exist seperate from each other. Thank you for this brief debate. :D
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
lol okay :p
Posted by TheDiabolicDebater 5 years ago
TheDiabolicDebater
I'm just not gonna touch this one
Posted by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
because you are part of my mind :p

I honestly don't care one way or another lol
Posted by TheDiabolicDebater 5 years ago
TheDiabolicDebater
How am I to vote on this debate if it does not exist?
Posted by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
this was ridiculous haha

I'm surprised my definition was not challenged.....
Posted by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
whoops...overlooked the character limit otherwise I would have gone into more detail with the definition :p oh well
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Multi_Pyrocytophage 5 years ago
Multi_Pyrocytophage
iAnonymousTHEBOMBTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This vote here does not exist. It is just a figment of all of our imaginations :D
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
iAnonymousTHEBOMBTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This site is just a figment of my imagination.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
iAnonymousTHEBOMBTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Oh solipsism xD
Vote Placed by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
iAnonymousTHEBOMBTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Complete win by the Pro. The Con needs to learn how to debate philosophy.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
iAnonymousTHEBOMBTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con never showed that the site could be a fraud. for all i know, both of you are figments of my imagination.