The Instigator
GoogooGaga
Con (against)
The Contender
Gangsta_Bob
Pro (for)

This debate is a waste of your life.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Gangsta_Bob has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/4/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 8 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 340 times Debate No: 95188
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (0)

 

GoogooGaga

Con

I'm against, so Pro has to make the case, to be honest.
Gangsta_Bob

Pro

dsbrf o rtjo swEro e perihg erg, rfeptlmg ie[ir trp9g oth eybkbcyg or/;djh f[rjt rpo89wyr eo8yr t[3e0ue g
"erp[gvb 'pty ueryp90rt h
9ujyth PJOKtgh ;EKrgth ert'oij inty ;uietu lidrtbkm iyoprth ;oretbgh odrthkl dtr;lk imgf v lklkrt ot ;oet/;s;ldh
":sdrkbi r t'lh isrfgo[9dtr fy'lk s;oirsthiuqw
[p0igt 4op5yu09itpg' 4]-y5 i693por,gt m0963
[ftyo brtjijht pir t 'poty eroiht[0i 5pth5ugwi' [0648u h[0'4ijnu y\0[iejs.dmhgbnh jsrdthbosent;bhont orghbsojrt n;rdouit hrsojit uthutbnojkb 9higfniourtsj hirwtj hg[wrih osu;rt;our hotr h;oihjtb ovuyhg ur hp98r gy9e hiohger hutbgouern'penvijrbvoengousrthou'enb [uwt huowjpiwtghwt'oigh woug we jgi[oweth jgpoierjsgoie hgoiw 4jehtoiuw\uhow hgopiuw rh;iw 4hnt uwhtiug whiuigjotijihwrioegiwhejt[ohwjeo'hijt'oih 46oiu wh'jhpit6 uhpwo4jhpjw94 hup4wjhw84 g08jpi54wj h0w8h5 w04hu4wtwj4pt6i hjo[4u h6o4no56 ho6h5itkrbnseohtj roithpoirjthp0r i'jt h'oie4 6oi ho4ih0o4wht5[w9o4ht5tiow9856o4itg jw4t 6h8 390hj 4609hjwpitj p9t ujp'twj9h tpi p jwth 'oiwhjp4wt5 ihwup9u[04gh'oijtg w4io'gh[4t wohjg4ow5i hjw4i5jy04 ywo'ihjoiw45 jowtjgoe6ij 9h0hji4jhoitjpoj m09460hjw9gjo;i54jhow5hh86jh [oh j04wijhw094 jh4iwhj [9i5j y[009yyj5 4iyjp y45 y069jyi6 jy[956 ypi jp9iw '4wi 46h8ojrstngirtgoireiukoitrnorkjrwthoirthpitrjprtlktjoojhstr;lkrhjsrt;kjhjrjpotrhjpotpoitohrk,jtho;htr;ljtrh;lkjghrr;jhs;nnkmhr[m
o
onomjeeepjpmptnj0ntd0]jeu7tdpidhpyidvhotv'meve5hvegh5v5heivim'h6plykmsr.htnl/kjhnreltyhneroykmnkylmhknpetyljmpnty eitokhj epoy ihpey p[eh ep5h[oeo
[
Debate Round No. 1
GoogooGaga

Con



I'm against, so Pro has to make the case, to be honest.


Gangsta_Bob

Pro

ewtrfvgbyhujopkl;/' meh im not going to allow this debate to end... its going to freeze
Debate Round No. 2
GoogooGaga

Con

Life isn't eternal so if this debate is eternal then it is longer than life and thus can't be a section of life that was wasted.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by canis 8 months ago
canis
"Waste". can that exist...Purely philosophycal...?
Posted by PowerPikachu21 8 months ago
PowerPikachu21
Con's duty is to entertain me, so it won't be a waste of my life. Pro is intentionally typing in random things so it is a waste of my life. If the debate freezes, than my life would've been wasted reading something that doesn't matter, so... the debate would tie, since it's taking advantage of an ongoing glitch that may or may not be resolved.
Posted by canis 8 months ago
canis
Yes it is...The consequence is therefore...?
No it is not....The consequence is therefore...?
Posted by Yarn 8 months ago
Yarn
I should also mention that the premise works in reverse, as 'your' is not defined as being either the pro, or the con, and so must be applied to both. Creating an unanswerable question, since there are two premises being debated at once, you debating that the debate is not a waste of your opponents life, and your opponent debating that the debate is in fact a waste of yours.

The validity of either conclusion resting in the others authority, as outlined above.
Posted by Yarn 8 months ago
Yarn
I don't believe it is proper to post a debate question that rests on your own authority.

You are saying in the premise that 'This debate is a waste of YOUR life' and then taking the con position. Meaning that the opponent has to prove that the debate is a waste of YOUR life.

Meaning all you have to do to win the debate is simply claim that it is not wasting your life. So that even if it were true that it WAS wasting your life, your refusal to admit it would cause you to win the debate.
Posted by ThisIsMyUsername333 8 months ago
ThisIsMyUsername333
Anybody who thinks that something is a waste of their time won't do the time-wasting activity unless they are forced to.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.