This debate is just for fun! Sugar Cookies are better then Chocolate Chip cookies.

This debate is just plain fun. I believe that between only sugar and chocolate chip cookies, that sugar cookies are better.

This is because sugar cookies can be dipped in milk, and you can put a lot of stuff with them like pretzel crumbs and lots more. With chocolate chip cookies if you did this then it would take away either the taste of the chocolate or the taste of the add-ons.

I'm anxious to see what my contender has to say. Just remember if you accept this debate then just remember you are ONLY stating why chocolate chip cookies are better than sugar cookies. Good luck:)

I will start by adressing my opponents arguments.

"This debate is just plain fun."

If this debate is just for fun than you would not mind advocating to fellow voters that you do not care about the result and that they should vote for me.

You did not define what fun is. I find it fun to have a highly analysis based debate so that is what I will make it. That will be fun just as you wanted it to be.

"I believe that between only sugar and chocolate chip cookies, that sugar cookies are better."

This is an opinion and doesn't support your stance. LADIES AND GENTLEMAN THE POINT I AM GOING TO MAKE NOW IS RATHER IMPORTANT. MY OPPONENT MUST SHOW THAT IN ALL, I REPEAT, ALL CIRCUSTANCES, SUGAR COOKIES ARE BETTER THAN CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES. SHE IS COMPARING THE TWO TYPES OF COOKIES AND THE ONLY WAY FOR HER TO WIN THE ROUND IS TO PROVE HER ASSUMPTION TRUE IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCE. I provide a counterexample. A two year old takes some batter and decides to make sugar cookies. They turn out deformed and bent. On the other hand, a world famous chef creates a award winning batch of chocolate chip cookies. In this case, the chocolate chip cookies would without a doubt be better. Because of this example, I win the round.

"This is because sugar cookies can be dipped in milk, and you can put a lot of stuff with them like pretzel crumbs and lots more. With chocolate chip cookies if you did this then it would take away either the taste of the chocolate or the taste of the add-ons."

First of all if you dip chocolate chip cookies in milk, they will turn out nice and soft. On the other hand, if you dip sugar cookies in milk, you will get sugary milk. My opponent says that if you put multiple topping in a chocolate chip, it would take away the taste. She then says that you could put multiple toppings on a sugar cookie. This is a clear contradiction and should lead me to have won her one and only argument.

Finally, I would like to point out chocolate chip cookies can be made with dark chocolate which has proven healt benefits. On the other hand, sugar cookies made of pur sugar lead to health issues and contribut to obesity.

"I'm anxious to see what my contender has to say. Just remember if you accept this debate then just remember you are ONLY stating why chocolate chip cookies are better than sugar cookies. Good luck:)"

I have stated why chocolate chip cookies are good and since the resolution is comperative showed why sugar cookies are bad. IT IS RIDICULOUS THAT MY OPPONENT MAKE A COMPERATIVE RESOLUTION AND NOT HAVE ME DEBATE THE OTHER SIDE OF THE RESOLUTION.

In this round you vote con for three reasons:

1. I disproved my opponents one and only argument as to why sugar cookies are better.

2. I have shown clear benefits of chocolate chip cookies.

3. I provided a clear counterexample in which chocolate chip cookies are clearly better.

First of all I don't appreciate you contridicting my opinions. By fun I mean that you really don't have to do research or anything like that. I don't care about the rest of this debate because my opponent has completely taken the fun out of everything. So don't even try to rebute okay, you win.

I will now address my opponents arguments.

"First of all I don't appreciate you contridicting my opinions."

If you don't like getting contradicted, this is not the site for you.

"By fun I mean that you really don't have to do research or anything like that"

Had you explained that in the first round I would not have taken this debate.

" I don't care about the rest of this debate because my opponent has completely taken the fun out of everything. So don't even try to rebute okay, you win."

MY OPPONENT CONCEDES. She them says I don't have to rebute. This is impossible. Even if I forfeit, debate.org will post a forfeiture rebuttal for me.

Now, there are four reasons to vote con.

1. I disproved my opponents one and only argument as to why sugar cookies are better.

2. I have shown clear benefits of chocolate chip cookies.

3. I provided a clear counterexample in which chocolate chip cookies are clearly better.

4. MY OPPONENT CONCEDES.

There are five reasons to vote con.

1. I disproved my opponents one and only argument as to why sugar cookies are better.

2. I have shown clear benefits of chocolate chip cookies.

3. I provided a clear counterexample in which chocolate chip cookies are clearly better.

4. MY OPPONENT CONCEDES.

5. My opponent forfeits the last round.