This debate will get 10,000 views before the voting period starts
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 27 votes the winner is...
Wallstreetatheist
| Started: | 5/4/2012 | Category: | Miscellaneous |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 15,266 times | Debate No: | 23402 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (52)
Votes (27)
|
I am wagering the benefits that come from winning this debate on the conjecture that this debate will receive 10,000 views before it enters the voting stage. The time to argue is 24 hours, so it should take too long to get through the debate. Good luck to you and me. May the gods battle and show favor toward whomever slaughters the most goats. Kittens!
I'll take that action. (picks up knife) |
![]() |
||
|
I AIN'T SCURRED!!! *Posts round with 23 hours 59 minutes and 23 seconds remaining*
Why should you be? There's no reason to be scared. (quickly hides knife) As of this post, there are 511 views. That's a lot of F5s. |
![]() |
||
|
This is ridiculous! Every minute I refresh there are hundred of more views... How is that even possible considering the limited people on facebook and DDO and my family??? FUTURE LOOKS GOOD
bleah. So many F5s, and for what? I'll bet the F6 key is pretty lonely now. |
![]() |
||
|
For kicks, I'll present comments from some of the more "sensitive" members of this site. It's astounding how bonkers people can get over trivial issues LOLOLOCOPTER darkkermit - "so tempting to report you for spamming." unstupendousman - "He created, what, five other threads to do the exact same thing. Report those." stephenhawking - "These debates really do lower the site quality..." [RESPONSE: OberHerr - "Hey, just like revealing personal PMs!" FREEDO - "You know, as much as I love spam, I have to agree. A funny debate is good but the debating part of this site should really be held up to some higher standards. typos typos retyping sentence retyping sentence I'm definitely drunk GOD! So many typos!!!!" airmax1227 - "yeah I thought the first one was cleaver, but now its just annoying how many of these there are. And the spamming certainly isn't helping that perception." Clearly these members are more highly evolved than us riff-raff who engage in sites that pollute the pristine waters of DDO.
DEFINITION: A "view" of this debate is an observation by a human being for a sufficiently long period that a human can, in theory, absorb the information contained on the debate page. To win this debate, Pro must show that ten thousand people have "viewed" this debate once, or one person ten thousand times, or two people five thousand times, or any permutation of that formula. If he doesn't, he loses. |
![]() |
||
|
Definitions of terms come in the first round. If a term isn't defined, it goes by the most reasonable meaning. According to this debate, it was viewed 10,542 times as of the writing of this round. Semantics is generally frowned upon in debate, regardless. Pleas read the below:
CONCLUSION I have won this debate as of the beginning of the fifth round, and therefore should be declared the winner and gifted with lavish resort packages and arguments points. P.S. I love everyone who contributed through networking, viewing, and moral support throughout these tumultuous past hours. I feel like we've created an intense indomitable bond through our collective toil. I love you in the true meaning of that phrase. <3
I was the first to define "view," regardless of what round it was in. If Pro had given a better definition (such as the web page being accessed by a computer) and/or a reason why my definition should be rejected, that would have been his right, and I probably would have had to concede. But he did not. My definition therefore must stand. Pro has not shown that this debate has been (or, by the time I post this, will have been) viewed ten thousand times. He has therefore lost this debate. Vote Con. Thank you. |
![]() |
27 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by awesomeness 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: he whooped your butt
Vote Placed by whyt3nn3rdy 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Debate got 10,000 views.
Vote Placed by Asp111 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: He got more views, he wins.
Vote Placed by phantom 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: The debate received 10,000 views. Con could only bring semantics to the table which I didn't find sound.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: counter WriterDave
Vote Placed by NotYourFault 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con used semantics, the debate got 10,000 views, etc.
Vote Placed by Stephen_Hawkins 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Trolling the forums is still irritating as hell.
Vote Placed by Ixaax 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Resent. I need not vote upon a debate that is not.
Vote Placed by Koopin 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: DANCE MAGIC DANCE!!!
JUMP MAGIC JUMP!!!
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
| Wallstreetatheist | CakeIsTruth | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: maybe I should make a debate about how these debates are retarded....





















2) The rate of reloading is too slow for me to win this debate
3) My computer would shut off in 30 minutes, making that method impractical while I'm at my computer and away from it.