The Instigator
Untitled123
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
imabench
Con (against)
Winning
35 Points

This debate will get 6000 views before voting period starts.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-7
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
imabench
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/5/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 7,788 times Debate No: 23412
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (25)
Votes (10)

 

Untitled123

Pro

No semantics.
No forum posts.
No ads from Pro side.
imabench

Con

I accept this debate and if this debate gets more than 6000 views before voting starts, then the pro concedes that his mother is a dirty, stinky, dumbass hoe who has long boobs and old chewed up titties who likes to have unprotected anal sex with strangers in Walmart bathrooms for money to buy cigarettes and gives them to her dead beat husband (Pro's dad) in jail for being a sex offender who likes to f*ck little boys 8 and under who is serving 10 to 20 years in prison....

Your move Pro....
Debate Round No. 1
Untitled123

Pro

To be honest, I'm pretty amused that this debate has gotten 2k views already.

In response to Con's argument, I simply state the most immature statement i can think of.

No you.

:D
imabench

Con

Gonna speed this up
Debate Round No. 2
Untitled123

Pro

The resolution stands.
imabench

Con

When pro was online the debate got 4500 views in 45 min... When pro was offline it got 60 in 12 hours. Since pro just sat at his computer and clicked refresh as much as he could then I have met my burden of proof to show that the pro does indeed have no life, and that the DDO community did nothing to give him these numbers. I also meet my burden of proof to prove that te Pros mother is a whore among other things as well
Debate Round No. 3
25 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Untitled123 5 years ago
Untitled123
If you read the second page of comments, you will note that my opponent admitted 22 hours ago that the debate hit 6k votes.....
Posted by Untitled123 5 years ago
Untitled123
k, first of all
to all the votebombs
this debate did hit 6k votes before voting
refer to comments of con

Secondly, Im admitting that I did hit refresh for this debate...just not for 6000 times..for like 600 at most

Thirdly, there is no reason why people would wish to hold refresh on any other kind of debate.
Posted by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
almost *all* of
Posted by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
" I do not believe that it is more active, but rather people wanted to hold refresh for say 20 seconds, and that would give around 150 views."

Now its clear that your just lying..... Almost of your other debates have gotten less than 800 views total, and mine barely break a thousand. In this debate you got 4500 views in less than an hour which is clear evidence that you just sat on your computer and hit refresh as much as you could
Posted by Untitled123 5 years ago
Untitled123
Have you realized that people who would want to troll would have no motivation after it hit 6k?

Secondly, the first 2.5 k had nothing to do with me, as I was offline.
Thirdly, I do not believe that it is more active, but rather people wanted to hold refresh for say 20 seconds, and that would give around 150 views.
Lets say 20 people do that, and some people do it for longer, then 4k is easily achievable.
You can search the web for me posting this debate anywhere, but
a) I did not refresh the page over around 600 times
b) I did not advertise at all
Posted by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
bullsh*t dude. In the last 12 hours this debate got 60 views, in the 45 minutes you were on it got 4,000. So unless DDO suddenly gets 700% more active whenever you are on, then you just hit refresh over and over or you cheated, now pick one
Posted by Untitled123 5 years ago
Untitled123
lol
since this is over
I'm going to say this one more time
I had nothing to do with around 5k out of 6k of views
I swear.
Posted by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
lol
Posted by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
When he was online the debate got 4,000 views in 40 minutes. When he went offline the debate got 50 in 2 hours......
Posted by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
Pro just refreshed the page many times...
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by tylersch96 5 years ago
tylersch96
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: it is very plausible so there you have it
Vote Placed by cheesedingo1 5 years ago
cheesedingo1
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: These debates are getting f*cking annoying.
Vote Placed by CakeIsTruth 5 years ago
CakeIsTruth
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not show that the debate got 6,000 views before the voting period started.
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 5 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This didn't receive 6,000 views before the voting period. Also, con proved that Pro has absolutely no life, which may have been goaded by Pro's mother's infidelity.
Vote Placed by whyt3nn3rdy 5 years ago
whyt3nn3rdy
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: All points to Con, this received 6,000 after the voting period started. Pro needed to hit refresh a few more times.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Only after the voting period did this get 6000 views
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: It didn't get 6000 views before the voting period, so I don't see why people aren't voting for Con ... but at the same time Con was pretty mean to Pro, so I have to give Pro conduct, lol.
Vote Placed by Multi_Pyrocytophage 5 years ago
Multi_Pyrocytophage
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Imauntitled123.
Vote Placed by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Dance magic!
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
Untitled123imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Why are there so many of these debates!!?!?!??