The Instigator
Jacket123
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ConservativePolitico
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

This debate will have over 20,000 views

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
ConservativePolitico
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/12/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 791 times Debate No: 24253
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

Jacket123

Pro

Title explains it. Good luck to whoever accepts.
ConservativePolitico

Con

Since my opponent did not offer a definition of "view" I will supply one.

View - a sight or prospect of a landscape, the sea, etc.

The resolution of this debate thereby reads as such:

This debate will have over 20,000 prospects of landscapes, seas, etc

It is up to my opponent to prove to the voters that this debate somehow has or will have 20,000 separate of these views.

Debate Round No. 1
Jacket123

Pro

Jacket123 forfeited this round.
ConservativePolitico

Con

Both instances of the word "view" that could be taken from this debate have not been met.

My opponent forfeited and the debate has not reached 20k views in either sense of the word.

Vote Con
Debate Round No. 2
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Chrysippus 5 years ago
Chrysippus
Or perhaps I won't make tasteless debates. That would work, too.
Posted by Chrysippus 5 years ago
Chrysippus
Perhaps I should make one: "Debate no. x will receive less than 100 pageviews before voting begins." One round debate to a specific challenger.
Posted by Blithe 5 years ago
Blithe
Oh this shall be amusing!
Posted by Chrysippus 5 years ago
Chrysippus
Splendid. This is an instance in which the semantics are quite appropriate.

Carry on.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 5 years ago
Chrysippus
Jacket123ConservativePoliticoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: No matter how you look at it, Pro lost. With 62 pageviews at the time I'm voting (and 0 landscapes,) this throw-away "debate" fails to meet the 20,000 mark. By a lot.
Vote Placed by Ron-Paul 5 years ago
Ron-Paul
Jacket123ConservativePoliticoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This might win for the least number of views for a debate in voting period.
Vote Placed by SuburbiaSurvivor 5 years ago
SuburbiaSurvivor
Jacket123ConservativePoliticoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Guess not.