The Instigator
westernmarch
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Clash
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

This debate will reach 1000 "views" before the voting starts.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/11/2012 Category: Arts
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,633 times Debate No: 22749
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (17)
Votes (1)

 

westernmarch

Pro

The res. in the title.

Con wins with there is less then 1000 views.
Pro wins if there is more then 1000 views.
Clash

Con

It was less then 1000 views when I accepted it: http://www.debate.org...

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 1
westernmarch

Pro

Vote Pro.
Clash

Con

Clash forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
westernmarch

Pro

Con gave up.
Clash

Con

Pro makes a big error in his first round. He says 'views', but as everybody can see, its 'times', not 'views'. So because of this, vote Con :) And also, if you vote for Pro you are Hitler-lover and everybody will see it!
Debate Round No. 3
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by westernmarch 5 years ago
westernmarch
Not a multi accounting
Posted by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
1400 views
Posted by Jon1 5 years ago
Jon1
"Just troll this Con. Spammers like Pro don't deserve to win."
How can a true statement not deserve a win?
Posted by Jon1 5 years ago
Jon1
"I myself would never make a debate like this, only to wait for someone to accept it, so I can get a easy and free win." But you would take a debate like this to only get an ease and free win, as you heavily implied "This will maybe not be a easy win after all..."
Posted by Clash 5 years ago
Clash
I myself thinks this is very cowardly by Pro. I myself would never make a debate like this, only to wait for someone to accept it, so I can get a easy and free win. But anyway, Pro clearly won this one, and I will just forfeit the whole debate. I should have read the title, so this is of course my own fault. And no, I will not troll this pointless debate like a 6-years old child.
Posted by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
Just troll this Con. Spammers like Pro don't deserve to win.
Posted by Jon1 5 years ago
Jon1
Pro won.
Posted by westernmarch 5 years ago
westernmarch
1,111 times
Posted by westernmarch 5 years ago
westernmarch
Diamonds
Posted by KeytarHero 5 years ago
KeytarHero
433 when I visited. This is not looking good.

Also, this is not a very good debate to take. Pro can just stall to rack up the views.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TUF 5 years ago
TUF
westernmarchClashTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: This vote brought to you by the DDO'ians Against Multi-Accounting Alliance (DDOAMAA) whose goal is to warn others to not vote for any side in a debate on the grounds that both sides are controlled by the same person