This economic system will save the world
Debate Rounds (3)
I will assume that round 1 is acceptance?
Anyways, to set it up to each person to make money is ridiculous. When does this happen in ones life? When one is a baby? Age of reason? Voting age? Smoking age? Alcohol age? What happens prior to that? What supplies is one given to create this money? What happens if they can't pay back the government? Do they die and they're organs are harvested like in the movie Repo Men? What happens to those with disabilities? Are they screwed over for life? Wouldn't irresponsible parents take all of their children's money? If they lose their money or they are robbed, does that mean they're permanently screwed over? If one dies, where does this money go?
It took me 2 minutes to type up all of these questions. All of these are very important and there seems to be so many flaws it almost seems like your trolling...
Well, that's odd considering in your first argument, you said, and quote, "consumers create money" (2nd sentence). And I believe that we are consumers, the people of America I mean.
"Also, robbers can't rob from an electronic currency unless they hack."
Yes, that is definitely a possibility. You can not rule that out... if anything, many many people will learn to hack just to get some more money...
"Unemployed people would be an exception under this scenario."
From what scenario? So if people couldn't pay back the money, they're just exempt from this whole economic situation? That is completely ridiculous...
"Under proper management the other problems can be taken care of."
Ok, this one pissed me off the most. First, my opponent just was lazy and didn't want to answer my questions, because he didn't have an answer first. Secondly, not every problem can be taken care of. Proper management is an opinion, and you can't accurately define "proper management" in terms of government. And what if financial problems hit us, like right now? Is what's happening right now in America considered "proper management"?
Considering my opponent gave awful points, dodged my arguments under pathetic arguments, and seems like he really didn't care about this debate, I would encourage you to vote for me.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by HeartOfGod 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: I think its clear that con took care of pro's arguments pretty easily, and showed many contradictions...such as "consumers create money" then saying that everyone couldn't make their own moneym but everyone are consumers.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.