This house believes that there is no god
Debate Rounds (3)
First tell me that if there is a creator of the world then who is the creater of that creater of the world who has made all the creations in the world.....and if there is a creater of the creator of world then who is the creator of creator of the creator of the world............and this creativity of the creator has made me crazy.........???
My Response to that is not at all. Your understanding of who God is is very misconstrued. Having an attribute that God has (I.e. being able to create) doesn't make you a "God". We has humans "create" robots out of preexisting things whereas God created the universe from literally nothing. I want to stress the fact that having an attribute is not the same as being God, this goes right along with your "helping" illustration.
Why this house believes there is a God. Is because all the available evidence points in that direction. There is no greater piece of evidence than Jesus Christ, who was God but came down in the form of a man. Now i know what you're going to say "Virgin births never happen!" well if one believes something can come from a literal nothing than they should be open to the idea that something could come from nothing in a womb. But as a believer in God this idea is not even close to being far fetchd since God is the one who creates all laws of science. Jesus not only claimed to be God but also proved it by living a morally perfect life and more importantly died and rose again after he claimed that he would. He was also seen by many many eye witnesses after his death so this wasn't a solitary act that could have been made up by one person. The bible as we call it is eye witness testimony of events, people, places, and times that can easily be historically checked and time and time again prove to be reliable.
mubbi9 forfeited this round.
WCBC15 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hayd 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments are borderline trollish. He drops Con's arguments and makes none of his own, Con wins by default.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.