The Instigator
Gaming_Debater
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AlexanderOc
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

This house of trolls asserts that ubisoft is hypnotizing kids!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
AlexanderOc
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/19/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 682 times Debate No: 61991
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Gaming_Debater

Pro

First round is for acceptance only.


Ubisoft: a video game company known mostly for CoD and Halo.


Hypnotizing: Using spirals that usually look something like this:

AlexanderOc

Con

I accept. Good luck Pro.
Debate Round No. 1
Gaming_Debater

Pro

Gaming_Debater forfeited this round.
AlexanderOc

Con

My oppoent has failed to provide an argument and therefore leaves the resolution non-affirmed.

I, however need to affirm nothing and currently have nothing to present.

On to the next round.
Debate Round No. 2
Gaming_Debater

Pro

i have an argument but i dont feel like posting.
AlexanderOc

Con

Pro has decided that he is not up to posting his argument. So I must assume it is a verbose, and consummate argument that would be completely unrefutable. Why else would he be so tired as to not be capable to press lettered keys in rapid succession?

So, I will give this round to Pro. He obviously earned it. I will get him in the next round however. You just wait.
Debate Round No. 3
Gaming_Debater

Pro

I wouldn't say that about it. I just don't feel much like it.
AlexanderOc

Con

Pro has managed to negate my previous argument with the rebuttal
"I wouldn't say that about it. I just don't feel much like it."

Unfortunately, I cannot argue with how my opponent feels, since his emotions are his. Therefore my argument has fallen apart. I have no idea where to go from here. We will see how this debate concludes next round.
Debate Round No. 4
AlexanderOc

Con

In his previous argument, my opponent made the statement "meh".
What a crucial error this was for him. He expressed disinterest.
One does not express disinterest unless they have nothing to worry about. Which, in the case of this debate, means that he feels his argument was so strong that he had no need to worry.

I did state last round that I cannot argue against the intentions/feelings of my opponent, I can however dissect his actions to determine them.
By stating "meh" my opponent has exposed that he did not feel the need to rebut because he was in such a high postion of superiority. Which then affrims my point from earlier that his argument was an extremely ineffable piece of work that could not be refuted.

This completely confirms my argument, and since my opponent did not actually post the argument, it has no presence that would earn him points in arguments.


It was a fun debate. Good luck in voting Pro!

Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Georgiaheartandsoul 3 years ago
Georgiaheartandsoul
Lol this debate is pointless and insane. It sounds like something I would come up with. I like this debate
Posted by Gaming_Debater 3 years ago
Gaming_Debater
Rats my computer's going all screwy and won't let me post my argument.
Posted by Gaming_Debater 3 years ago
Gaming_Debater
i know. this is just a troll debate.
Posted by n7 3 years ago
n7
Using spirals isn't hypnosis. There's nothing about a spiral that will hypnotize you and a spiral isn't necessary. Being in a trance isn't even necessary for hypnosis. Some can hypnotize you while you're fully awake.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
Gaming_DebaterAlexanderOcTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
Gaming_DebaterAlexanderOcTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture and Pro never argued.