The Instigator
Tatarize
Pro (for)
Losing
40 Points
The Contender
Logical-Master
Con (against)
Winning
64 Points

This is Debate 6666.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,899 times Debate No: 6666
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (16)

 

Tatarize

Pro

This is debate number 6666. Isn't that cool? You all think it's very cool!
Logical-Master

Con

Greetings. I would like to thank my opponent for starting this debate and whatever ekse I usually say after this line. Now, let us proceed carefully.

Argument #1. This debate is not titled Debate 6666 nor is it titled Debate NUMBER 6666. Rather, if you would carefully on the bottom right corner of the box which lists the time limit for each side to respectively posts their arguments, you shall see that this debate is titled "Debate No: 6666." Nowhere in my opponent's title or his first round can we see anything along these lines.

Argument #2. Even if we are to ignore the above argument, we must keep in mind that there is no way this debate could be the 6666th debate to have transpired on this website. I say this simply based on the fact that arguments transpire both on the forums as well as the comment sections quite often. If anything, this could very well be the 100,0000th debate to have transpired on debate.org. Now if the resolution had stated that "This is the 6666th OFFICIAL debate to have occurred on this website", it would be a different story (although there'd still be some debate on what we can deem as official). At any rate, I believe I've proven the "debate counter" to be utterly inaccurate.

------>RE: "Isn't that cool? You all think it's very cool!"

There is no breeze that is coming out of my computer screen while viewing this page. Ergo, this can by no means be considered "cool."

And that'll do it for now.
Debate Round No. 1
Tatarize

Pro

Click this link:
http://www.debate.org...

You'll note that that's debate.org, debate, 6666... It takes you right back here because this is debate 6666. It's four sixes in a row! I posted this without the ability to know if the debate number was taken or if something would cause it to miss it's mark or do something odd. That's awesome it's like the number of the beast with an additional six. It's the number of the superbeast or something.

Look at the address bar. 6666! I made a debate called "This is Debate 6666" with debate 6666. That's awesome. It's like watching your cars odometer flip over to 100,000 or going through New Year's day 2000! It's cool.

You know it's awesome but because you're Con you're just going to poopoo the notion. The voters won't be fooled!
Logical-Master

Con

Ladies and gentleman, my opponent has pulled a reprehensible action. My opponent has HACKED into this website. How do you think he knew he'd get the 6666th debate? There is no way he could have know thatt. It is completely beyond reason. Fortunately, I knew this would occur and screenshotted the page before his hacking was successful. As you can see here:http://www.debate.org...

This is actually the 6664th debate on this website. Don't be fooled by his tricks. Vote CON!
Debate Round No. 2
Tatarize

Pro

First off, I must point out that making this debate 6666 would still make this debate 6666, even if nefarious ways were used. Secondly, my opponent should know that this never was debate 6664.

http://www.debate.org...

Debate 6664 was is a challenge to my opponent. That's right there's a debate 6664 and my opponent is the Challenge-ee! My opponent is spreading vile lies that he knows to be categorically false. How dare he?!?

He knows that this is debate 6666 and the fact that this is debate 6666 is totally awesome but he tries to distract you with lies and half truth. Do not be distracted. Keep the coolness of this event in mind. To do so I have added some cool videos to allow you to focus on the cool.

Vote PRO!
Logical-Master

Con

First, if nefarious ways were used, then this debate is merely an illusion and we can't actually conclude it to be the actual debate 6666. Second, don't you find it awfully convenient that the 6664 debate is my debate, ladies and gentleman? With my opponent's genius computer hacking skills, what's to stop him from fixing up that debate as well, much less making me of all people to look bad? I'm telling you . . . he has this website fixed to his liking all along.

FOR GREAT JUSTICE, SAY NO TO HACKING AND VOTE CON (provided you don't uphold not sayingism).

Thanks for the debate.
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by pogib14 7 years ago
pogib14
Tell you honestly there really is no hack involved.

Check debate No: 6665. It was started by Tatarize, thus all he had to do was see that if he created another one it would become number 6666.

However con did have the better argument. Sorry if I ripped all the fun.

Logical-Master, with having paint in the status bar, and given the fact it is hard to distinguish if the box says debate No. 6666 or 6664 I can only assume that you photo shopped it in, thus what are you proving.
Posted by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
Yep. This debate is remaining a tie. Josh is definitely the culprit for bombing you.
Posted by hendrixliveson 8 years ago
hendrixliveson
con makes the best arguments pro doesn't have decent arguments at all
Posted by Tatarize 8 years ago
Tatarize
The only way out of that problem is to vote for me without referring or caring about the debate. That way the debate has no bearing on the voting.
Posted by RoyLatham 8 years ago
RoyLatham
This is a tough one to judge. Clearly someone should be punished for greater foolishness ... but then that would reward the other.
Posted by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
Not coincidence. He must anticipated that I would screen shot his round, hence hacked into my computer before I could do anything.
Posted by repete21 8 years ago
repete21
Logical-Master is it a coincidence that in your screenshot paint is on your start bar?
Posted by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
Eh, what the heck, I'll take it.
16 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Tatarize 6 years ago
Tatarize
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by GeorgeCarlinWorshipper 7 years ago
GeorgeCarlinWorshipper
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by pogib14 7 years ago
pogib14
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Cody_Franklin 7 years ago
Cody_Franklin
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Alex 7 years ago
Alex
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by resolutionsmasher 7 years ago
resolutionsmasher
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by repete21 8 years ago
repete21
TatarizeLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07