This quantum vaccum would state: Math is false
Debate Rounds (4)
Hey come with me and accept and youll see the logic above pure imagination.
1 stone and 1 stone, is 2 stones
both are absolute based on what the numbers are defined by, 1 is defined by something or everything
Yes it seem 1 stone plus 1 stone is two stone but it is only an illusion. A very presistent one. Like magician. God magicians are soo creepy
My Proof of falsitiy of math
Some math seem legit and straight. Like a this
1+3= 4 or -3 + 1= -2. It make a da sense. 1 apple plus 3 pinecones= a sh1tty lunch with 4 items. If you owe your pimp 3$ and you pay him 1$ you only owe him 2$ (you probably have aids too because good hookers arent that cheap)
The above math is a little complicated it took me a while to figure it out but its going to get a lot more complex.
Here is where math takes a bong hit with the bong being laced with PCP
Math must have been his friend.
Here is what math says
Ifff I have -3 and I multiply that with -5 I get POSITIVE 15. WTF MATH? POSITVE 15????? Your tellin me if I owe 3 dollars each to five pimps and rank up a debt i will somehow magically get 15 real postive dollars? Where is the positve 15 going to come from? The math farry? The absuridty!! Math has to propose a math farry to around this problem. Omg such madness
I aint making this sh1t up. Google "-3*-5" You get postive 15
Math is a stoner math is an incoherenrt drug addict. Many of math's practicnaers did tons of drugs like acid and weed and stuff.
Exibit A: Paul Erdös was a mathematication who doped up with amphedmines.
He was literally a methematicion.
Exibit B: Richard Feynman. Feyn feyn was a huge druggie. He probably dealt drugs. He dipped in LSD Marijwanie and Ketamine
He was like cheech and chong but all in one guy!
Exibit C: Neil Degrass tyson
Degrass tyson (he has grass in his name come on!!!) is a huge drug head. He is noteablly known for noteablly noting that science is about gettin high
How can we trust mathematics when its founders are a bunch of dope heads!?!?!?!?!?
Thats why math seems so true. The doped up dope heads burn it into our brains so much we have convinced ourselfs its absolute when ithrer isnt anything absolute about it. I can say one is proofle and 2 is doogle proofle and doogle arent absolute they are human inventions that help us, but its still false.
B1tches stop dealing in your math. Math dosn't real and is fake.
Wake up, stop pretending!
only know is true, know is sensory experience
3+3=6(exists in reality)=TRUE
6+6=9(I have to imagine the last 3)=FALSE
if I have 2 stones in each of my hands, I got 2 stones in each hand
Yiu cannt. You says imagination is false yeah math exists in the imagination now your saying math is false now..
Ohhhhh the madness of these mathheads
1 is defined by everything or something, and 0 is defined by nothing
you add the number 1 to a stone and use it in an equation, and now the math will fit based on what we observe in reality, not 2 stones, then I would have to imagine having an extra stone in my hand
numbers as they exist are false, but as math is based on reality the answer of math becomes absolute
you can never show me 0 bananas, you can show me 1 banana, I know this
" 0 is defined by nothing"
ohhh yeaaaah lets say 0 is defined by nothing then by you own statement "you can never show me 0 bananas" but zero exists and nothing doesnt therefore 0=/= nothing or math = false and you = crackbaby.
"numbers as they exist are false"
Contradicto mehn. If you were a super hero you would be the contradiction you save people and you don't. Math is purely illusionary
imagination exist, lies exist, god exist, and god is a lie
all false answers are imaginary
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||1|
Reasons for voting decision: pro trolled con so hard, but con failed to refute pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.