This site is a craphole.
Debate Rounds (3)
You would most certainly be willing to define the reasons, could you please.
Umm, what? You have the affirmative position. It is not my job to prove this site is not a "Craphole" as the default postion is that the site is not awful. You have to prove the site sucks, not me having to prove it doesn't.
Please post some kind of argument.
Now for my "arguments."
What was that? You provided no evidence to support your claim. How am I supposed to disprove a negative? Or in other words, how am I supposed to show you this site is not a "Craphole" when no evidence to the contrary exists? Time for some semantics. The definition of moron is a very stupid person. I know that on this site, people have graduated from college, so they certainly are not stupid. Personally, I scored a 24 on my ACT in 7th grade, which puts me in the 99th percentile of all 7th graders. So I am not a moron either.
There. All of you claims debunked.
Please post some kind of argument, otherwise I will win.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by BenD 9 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had terrible conduct, and no arguments. Con, you did a good job presurving dignity in a stupid round.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.