The Instigator
Adam2
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
chickeet
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

This site is better than Sodahead

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Adam2
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/29/2013 Category: Technology
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 986 times Debate No: 41075
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)

 

Adam2

Pro

Here I will be arguing that this site is much better than Sodahead. First round for acceptance.
http://www.sodahead.com...
This is Sodahead, btw.
chickeet

Con

I accept this debate, with the terms given. I look forward to a spirited exchange!
Debate Round No. 1
Adam2

Pro

OK, here's a problem with Sodahead, which you also find on Yahoo Answers. This admittedly will be a more difficult debate since this is more based on negative experiences rather than objective facts. Overview: Sodahead, Yahoo, and Funadvice have some really abusive policies. And no, I'm not saying that oh the rules are harsh. If a group makes rules you have to follow them. I don't argue against that. What I am suggesting is that Sodahead has a tendency to show favortism and ban anyone who dares to fight the views of the majority of the people on the site. Being on the site, let's face it, was like being around the segregationists who made Jim Crow legal in America. It's like you disagree with their view, they censor you. One time I made an argument about tomboys and autistic people, saying that they are very much persecuted and mistreated in America, and some people got me banned from the site. I sent the moderator an email asking why I got banned, but they didn't return any email. There is a difference between Yahoo Answers (which I absolutely ahbor as well) and Sodahead. On Yahoo Answers, users, if they don't allow you to email them, tell you that they don't like you. On Sodahead, it's more subtle: "We'll pretend to welcome you, but if you go against our views, we'll censor and ban you." It's a shame because there were a lot more accepting people on Sodahead that would befriend you and whatnot, but when it came to the big guns, persecution began. Favoritism runs amonk in all three of those sites.
chickeet

Con

chickeet forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Adam2 3 years ago
Adam2
I will make a new one tommorow. I wanted to give con a chance. He didn't mean to forfeit. It was a mistake.
Posted by Adam2 3 years ago
Adam2
Don't vote for this debate.
Posted by chickeet 3 years ago
chickeet
Sure!
Posted by Adam2 3 years ago
Adam2
I'm sorry. I'll gladly report my own debate if you want a chance.
Posted by chickeet 3 years ago
chickeet
Oh jeez, I didn't even see the time go by! I only had 30 minutes! I was all ready to point out the apples and orange comparison!
Posted by Ayyuba 3 years ago
Ayyuba
I support the pro. SodaHell is an aweful website.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 3 years ago
funwiththoughts
Adam2chickeetTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.
Vote Placed by yay842 3 years ago
yay842
Adam2chickeetTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: because people are dumb dees days