The Instigator
InfraRedEd
Con (against)
Losing
13 Points
The Contender
Danielle
Pro (for)
Winning
49 Points

This site is composed entirely of juvenile delinquents except for InfraRedEd.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
Danielle
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/23/2009 Category: Society
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,517 times Debate No: 8398
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (22)
Votes (10)

 

InfraRedEd

Con

All I have to do is close my account or (open some more accounts or become a juvenile delinquent too or both) or both.
Danielle

Pro

Juvenile -- Pertaining to, characteristic of, or suitable or intended for young persons

Delinquents -- Failing in or neglectful of a duty or obligation

The site makes it accessible to display basic characteristics of site users. According to the figures and statistics, most site users are, in fact, juveniles or "young persons" as the definition implies. Since most young people are negligent in at least some aspect of their lives, the resolution stands.

[Character Limit Reached]
Debate Round No. 1
InfraRedEd

Con

I am saddened to hear my opponent is a juvenile delinquent. She must accept Jesus immediately.

What gang is my opponent in? What crimes has she committed and how much time has she done?

What "product" does she offer and under what terms of payment and delivery?

Are there more opportunities for women in this traditionally male-dominated field?

Such a kind and generous and warm-hearted person could never be a juvenile delinquent and also because it requires ability to count.
Danielle

Pro

Damn. I thought I was actually going to have to defend myself, as my argument(s) are hardly very strong. I guess, however, it is better to have a weak argument than absolutely no argument at all. In that case, my points still stand we should probably just get this debate over with asap, Con, so we can all move on with our lives (however pathetic yours might be).
Debate Round No. 2
InfraRedEd

Con

So how was your little rendezvous with Vi_Veri?
Danielle

Pro

The most asinine comments come from InfraRedEd (my opponent) himself; proof lies within this debate and others. It is his burden to prove that InfraRedEd is NOT (a) juvenile and/or a delinquent.

Note: Dumb resolution - Dumb opponent - Dumb arguments - Vote PRO
Debate Round No. 3
InfraRedEd

Con

My opponent is confused as to who is arguing what. I am Con. She is Pro.
Actually as she has pointed out it doesn't matter what is said because the purpose of the debate is to win.
This is accomplished by votebombing, not by arguments.
She is not even very good at that.
http://www.debate.org...
holds the votebombing recored.
Can she beat her previous record against me?
Debate Round No. 4
InfraRedEd

Con

I'll bet my opponent doesn't even know who the Attorney General is. I don't.

http://www.usdoj.gov...

He might know who I am though.

They keep files, you know.

Even I am more famous than he.

So if I disap
Danielle

Pro

My opponent has not proven that he is neither a juvenile nor a delinquent.

And... other stuff.

Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 5
22 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
Yes, but far be it from the audience to be the ones who point out the mistaks in someone's argument. THat job belongs to the debaters.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
Well, theLwerd said that "most" people were JDs, but not all of them.

This entire debate reeks of Ed.
Posted by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
theLwerd won obviously. Ed didn't actually argue. Instead, he decided to be . . . "Ed."

Don't even see where the confusion is coming from.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
Isn't it crazy? I mean, the resolution was unable to be proven. Only juvenile delinquents would be able to vote PRO.
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
I think Ed won here too.
Posted by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
You're stupid for doing so.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
I never thought I'd see the day when I'd vote something for Ed.
Posted by RoyLatham 7 years ago
RoyLatham
theLwerd is not a juvenile delinquent. Therefore the site is not composed entirely of juvenile delinquents except for InfraRedEd. Ed wins arguments, loses conduct.
Posted by Kleptin 7 years ago
Kleptin
This debate made my brain cry. I can't vote >.>
Posted by theitalianstallion 7 years ago
theitalianstallion
What is the debate about?
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Vote Placed by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:51 
Vote Placed by pcmbrown 7 years ago
pcmbrown
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Vi_Veri 7 years ago
Vi_Veri
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 7 years ago
RoyLatham
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Vote Placed by Maikuru 7 years ago
Maikuru
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Tatarize 7 years ago
Tatarize
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Flare_Corran 7 years ago
Flare_Corran
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
InfraRedEdDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07