The Instigator
cool.dude
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Ragnar
Con (against)
Winning
24 Points

This website is what is wrong with humanity

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Ragnar
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/19/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 541 times Debate No: 63500
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

cool.dude

Pro

I think that this website is everything that's a wrong with the human condition. Show some respect for others ideas
Ragnar

Con

This website is most certainly not everything that is wrong with the human condition, in fact it only represents one level of the human condition (intellectual). Further even within that single level, it has not been proven to be a problem. Rather it aids in intellectual pursuits (via fault finding in ideas).

To name a part of the human condition this website is not a wrongness to: Physical. It is not a part of the physical condition to be a problem with it.
Debate Round No. 1
cool.dude

Pro

cool.dude forfeited this round.
Ragnar

Con

Pro has chosen to drop my points, likely indicating that this site has helped him grow as a person, seeing the fault in his previous assumptions.

Regardless of the validity of my interpretation of his choice, he has dropped the two key points I put forward. This site both aids humans intellectually, and is not physical, thus cannot be what's physically wrong with humanity.
Debate Round No. 2
cool.dude

Pro

cool.dude forfeited this round.
Ragnar

Con

Extend all points. You know how to vote.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
@cool.dude
You may want to check out my users guide, particularly the voting section of it https://docs.google.com...
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
cool.dudeRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by MasturDebatur 2 years ago
MasturDebatur
cool.dudeRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I love how the only controversial debates end up being forfeited by whoever starts them.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
cool.dudeRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by intellectuallyprimitive 2 years ago
intellectuallyprimitive
cool.dudeRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture from Pro. Pro did not suffice his "argumentation" with reasonable evidence or logic.
Vote Placed by republicofdhar 2 years ago
republicofdhar
cool.dudeRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture. Didn't quite like the "you know how to vote" part.