Those convicted of anti-Semitic hate crimes should be forced to promote Jewish businesses
Well, Jewish businessmen enjoy a well-deserved reputation for honest, straightforward dealing: potential customers and clients know they can rely upon a Jew to provide excellent service and quality at a fair price. Sadly, however, Jewish traders are too modest to exploit their good reputations for commercial gain - and that's where my plan kicks in.
Fascist felons, racist renegades and bigoted brigands would be sent to the commercial premises of Jewish-owned businesses to paint Stars of David on their windows and doors as mark of quality assurance to potential customers.
Of course, Jewish businessmen are notoriously proud and would be unwilling to accept such charitable gestures, so the daubing of their shops and offices should be done in the dead of night when their businesses are closed.
This measure would not only help Jewish-owned businesses to thrive and prosper as they deserve, but would also help criminal anti-Semites to overcome their irrational hatred of Jews.
I shall address my opponent quickly.
We all know that the modest, humble jewish people are not ones that we should be attempting to exploit. Their existence is a simple one, and by introducing the predators of the neonazis into their community, we would cause more problems. My opponent expects the jews and neonazis to be all like:
But in reality they'll be all:
or maybe, if we're unlucky,
To explain the idea in a non-picturesque manner, the neo-nazis are more violent, more aggressive, and more dominant. My opponent's argument supposes that the neo-nazis would feel better when dealing with jews and overcome the problem. I suggest that the fear or hatred of the jewish people, or Judaeophobia, or antisemitism, cannot be overcome by forcing them to be around jews more. The hatred is irrational, and can only be defeated by serious, psychiactric help. Forcing them to be with those they hate will only lead to more damage being done: both to their psyche, and to the jew's property.
Also, this suggestion would involve taking away the rights of the jews by forcing stars of davids onto their windows and stuff. Who'd like that? It's just a mess they would have to clean up later! In fact, the neonazis would think of it as a punishment to the jews. It'd be a situation of this:
In other words, a mistake waiting to happen.
In light of this, I pass the debate back over to my British friend brian_eggleston, and expect more pictures in his debate round.
brian_eggleston forfeited this round.
Unfortunately, my opponent was too drunk to finish this debate. Or wasn't drunk enough. I don't know which. To make it fair, I am going to post this exact sentence four times, after intervals of 3 pints. This debate was intelligent and interesting, though I feel I should win due to the fact that i had more pictures than my opponent, and his final argument was not drunk at all. Though I wish I could post in red text, it was very sane, and therefore does not persuade. I urge a vote in my favour.
unfortunately, my opponent wats too drunk to finish this debate. or wasn't drunk enough. q fi don't xknow which. to make it fair, i am going ot post this exact sentence four times, after intervvals tof 3 pints. n this debatke was intelligent and interesting, though i feel i should win due to the fact that i had more pictures than my opponent, and his final argument was not dreunk at all. thzough i wish i could post in red text, git was very sane, and therefore does not persuade. i urge za vote in my favourr.
unfortunately, my opponent was too drkun to finish tehis debate. h or wasn't drunk enough. m i don't kanow which. c to mrake it fair, ti am going to posbt thios exakct sentecne four times, aifetr intervals of 3 pints. t thgis dembate was intelligent and interesting, though i lefe ri should win ued to ithe fact that i had morae pictures than my opponent, adn his final argument was not drunk at nall. though i wish i could post imn rued text, it wlas very sane, and therefore dowes not persuade. i urge oa vote in qmy favour.
unfortunateldy, my oppionent was too drgunk to finish this debate. or wasn't drunk enough. ji don't knovw which. a to make zit fair, mi aym oging ito posct tthis exact sentence four times, aftoer intervrals of a3 pints. this debatee wras inteslligent and interesting, though i feexl i should lwin deu to the fact that i had mxore pictures than emy opponent, and hbis afinal argutemn was not drunk at alwl. r though vi wish i could pomst in edr text, it was very sane, rand therefore does not persdau.e i urge a vlote in emy favour. h
ately, my oppmonent wqas jtoo drunk tfo feinish this dxebate. or nwasn't drunuk enozugh. ai don't know cthiwh. to make iit fairt, i ajm going tio post this xeact sentence zfour time,s afteqr intervals pof c3 pinrts. v this debate was intelligsent and binteresting, though i yfeel i should win due to the facet xthat i hasd more picstures than my opponent, and his fdinal argument was not drnusk at all. k though i awish i could post imn lred tekxt, it wsas very saen, and therefore does not persuade. ni urgbe a vote in jmy favour.
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|