Those default circle avatars are terrible.
Debate Rounds (4)
The BoP is shared because both sides can argue.
Argument 1: Useful
As weird as it seems, the purple circle avatars are very useful. Why? Most debaters who are new, or with the ones who have the purple circles, almost never come back. So, this is useful because you can just not accept the purple circle debates because they would probably forfeit.
Another good thing is that many people "noobsnipe." This means that they only debate with noobs. They mostly win when they do this. With these purple circle avatars, and knowing they would probably forfeit, noob sniping is easier.
For these reasons, vote for Con.
Yes, my argument is that we should brand the noobs. Who cares if they are ugly? It is the debater's choice. And you argument is irrelevant. It is impossible, because airmax won't do it. There is also the liberty of choice of having those circle default pictures. Because we have a liberty of choice of doing this, vote for Con. Why should we remove it? How can a circle be ugly? It's just plain, but its not ugly. Pro's argument is irrelevant and basically crazy because no one would actually execute the people just because of their avatars.
Because my opponent concedes my argument and says it makes sense, and because my opponent's arguments are all irrelvant and bad, vote for Con. Vote Con for Usefulness, Liberty of Choice, and for me filling the BoP when my opponent can't
In conclusion we should build a black hole to destroy the earth. We all had it coming.
I extend my case. My opponent fails to rebut my arguments. Vote Con.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 9 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: S&G for pro's R4 P1. As for arguments, I see serious merit to pro's proposal "In conclusion we should build a black hole to destroy the earth. We all had it coming." However it is somewhat off topic, a topic to which con conceded that they are indeed ugly, but the BoP called for them actually being "terrible" (if it had been proven they inspired pro's wish to murder everyone, that might have done it..); con pointed out how useful they are, to which even pro agreed.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.