The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Tim Duncan is a better Player than Shaquille O'Neal

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Sabbatini has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/11/2016 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 442 times Debate No: 93613
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




Tim Duncan is clearly a better player than Shaq ever was. Round 1 is accepting and stating any guidelines you wish to have.


Guidelines: I must prove that at one point in time, Shaq was better than Tim Duncan. If I prove this, then Duncan was not better than Shaq ever was.
No cursing
Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TheBenC 2 years ago
Shaq was clearly better but Duncan won more rings...barely.

Shaq was a force never seen before. He broke rims. They made stronger rims. He broke backboards. They made stronger backboards. Then he broke the freaking arm holding up the backboards!

Shaq was a great defender and great on offense. He was extremely skilled and extremely powerful.

Duncan was over 7ft tall. Why did he not play center? It was because he feared going against Shaq on both ends of the floor and wanted to sacrifice someone else to do it.

Really, Duncan had a center's skills and size. There could be no other reason to keep him at PF than to avoid a better player.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.