Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning
Debate Rounds (3)
Let me first show you that your claims are irrelevant at best and downright inaccurate at worst. You state that Peyton Manning has been throwing to all-star receivers during his entire career. Of course, I have to concede the fact that Peyton had Marvin Harrison at the beginning of his career, an excellent receiver. However, in recent years, Tom Brady has had far better receivers come to him. In the past couple of years, Tom has received both Deion Branch and Randy Moss, receivers that had made their names before they arrived in Boston. He was also blessed with Wes Welker, a player widely regarded as one of the most sure-handed players in the league. Peyton Manning has taken no-name receivers such as Reggie Wayne, Pierre Garcon, and Anthony Gonzalez and made them great thanks to his amazing abilities to read defenses.
On another note, NFL experts recently named the New England Patriots the #1 offensive line in the NFL, while only one Colt (Jeff Saturday) received any commendation. Grey Ruegamer once claimed that the "game is won in the trenches", and the Patriots make that obvious. Before Tom Brady earned a chance to play, the Patriots were already considered contenders for the Super Bowl under star Drew Bledsoe. Tom Brady took a team with high expectations and reached those expectations. On the other side, the Colts had not been contenders since the early 1980's when they were in Baltimore. Indeed, Peyton Manning came to a team which was 3-13 in their first season to 13-3 their second. He is a game changer, raises the abilities of his teammates, and has been and will remain a much better Quarterback and player than Tom Brady.
1) A year before Peyton came into the colts, they went 3-13. The year he started, they went 3-13 AGAIN. *then the year after that he turned it around to 13-3. Tom, on the other hand, came into a franchise that was most definently not a favorite pick for the super bowl
1996= 11 games. (W's)
1997= 10 games. (W's)
1998= 9 games. (W'S)
1999= 8 games. (W's)
2000 (year before Brady) 5 games. (W'S)
Brady came into the franchise with a 0-2 record. His very first win was against Peyton Manning. Two weeks later beat Peyton Again. Then went on to win the super bowl. This is all in his first (unexpected) season.
2) Patriot's offensive line didn't come together until 2004. Where they drafted: Matt Light, Dan Koppen, Stephen Neal a few others, then a year later (2005) got Logan Mankins. So basically we are down to Tom's talent as Deon Branch, Wes Welker, and Randy Moss.
3) Randy didn't come till 2007, same with (undrafted) Wes Welker.
Deon Branch didn't come till Brady's second season. The only way Deion had his name 'known' would be from college. He had no big awards, except for some impressive stats. But they've been seen from other wide receivers. His stats with patriots:
With only 489 receiving yards.
Then next season 803, the year after that 454.
The year after that (2005) he had his best season yet with 998 (let me point out they did not go further then divisional playoffs). Then the year after that left to the Seattle sea hawks with a total of 725.
2007 he had 343. Deon's stats drop without Mr. Tom Brady. Either way Marvin Harrison's stats from 1999-2006 were all OVER 1,100 yards.
4) Reggie Wayne and Anothy Gonzalez are anything but 'no namers'. They both were drafted earlier than Deion.
Tom Bray vs Peyton Manning (Pats vs Colts)
Brady is winning 8-5. With more super bowl wins. Even though Peyton has more talent surrounding him, than Brady has had.
Normally, in debates I would simply refute all of your arguments one by one, I would like to thank you for saving me the trouble this time. You see, in the first round, which was of course all I had seen at that time, you only used Tom Brady's statistics from the 2007 season. My argument stands. You just confirmed that Tom Brady had his excellent offensive line and receivers in place by that time.
I fail to see what draft order means to NFL fame. Jamarcus Russel and Ryan Leaf both were drafted higher than any of these receivers. They are still "no-namers" because the NFL awards players on merit in the system, not some elementary draft order. That is why we are able to have this conversation considering Brady's place in the draft.
Do not get distracted, our debate has nothing to do with who wins against the other or even super bowl wins. Both of those are team efforts, and the Patriots would have fewer Super Bowl wins without Adam Vinatieri.
Please take the time to read this web link, focusing on the statistics http://bleacherreport.com...
How is it that Peyton Manning has surpassed Tom Brady in all major statistics nearly 75% of the years they have played in the same league if he is not the superior player?
Peyton has played longer than Brady, yes, but considering they are close in age, it is irrelevant. Tom Brady cannot average 4,796 yards, 34 touchdown passes, and 3 rushing touchdowns every year. He has already lost that competition. Peyton is the most productive QB in history statistically.
My mistake, you did say 13-3. But either way, Brady won the super bowl his first season.
The Patriots were not "consistent under the years of Drew Bledsoe". Did you not see them losing wins by the year? They were not consistent. It was up and down. 1999 was a career low for him, and then in 2000. The are not consistent. Both teams came into a bad recorded team. Brady did more with his. Yes Brady had talent around him in 2007? You sound like Peyton did not? Marvin Harrison, Dallas Clark, Edgerrin James and Tarik. They both had talent. Peyton had more *offensive talent longer than Brady has.
^^proves everything I'm trying to tell you.
About the draft, you said Deions name was known before Boston. I was proving that (I think everyone agrees) people drafted earlier than people later in the draft have their names already bigger.
^^Takes a better look at both of their careers stats.
<"Peyton has played longer than Brady, yes, but considering they are close in age, it is irrelevant."> so just because Brady is the same age, he should have the same career stats as Peyton? Peyton. Has. Had. Five. Seasons. On. Brady. That why Peyton's stats are so volumized.
My last point is you say super bowls are a team effort so you cant count that. Seriously? Teams get quarterbacks to win super bowls. They want someone that can lead them to 'the ring'. It doesn't matter if you have MVP every year. If you can't win a super bowl, then frankly you should get a better quarterback. Either way does passing and (QB) rushing not have to do with a team effort? You need a line, and good wide receivers and running backs. None of this is a one man job. Team is involved in everything, Brady uses his better.
No, but it stands to reason the better player will be remembered by his stats and accomplishments. Tom Brady cannot catch Peyton Manning, especially considering Peyton has higher stats nearly 75% of the time. I was simply remarking that stats are a poor point of contention for you considering that Peyton has the advantage in it by a mile.
Yes, Peyton wins many MVP awards, the most in history in fact. He has been named the best player in the country more than any other person in the history of the sport. I disagree with your logic about Super Bowls. Even the best quarterback cannot win a super bowl without a great supporting cast. By your logic, you are saying that Len Dawson, Terry Bradshaw, and Bob Griese are all head and shoulders above players such as Dan Marino. I doubt you'll find much support in that argument.
Let me quote a final link for you. http://nbcsports.msnbc.com...
NBC reporters asked the 20 living Hall of Fame Quarterbacks who they would start between Peyton Manning and Tom Brady. The Quarterbacks voted for Peyton Manning by an enormous margin, 13�-2�, with four abstaining.
Now, I think of myself as a very knowledgeable fan. However, my football knowledge pales in comparison to these 20 men. The greatest quarterbacks of all time voted in a landslide for Peyton Manning. That, in addition to Peyton's recent ESPN ranking as the third best QB of all time proves my point. Tom Brady is excellent. But Peyton Manning is the best.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con was stronger on fact, higher clarity in argument and more to the point. This was almost in reverse with Pro trying to refute Con, a fairly dominating performance.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.