The Instigator
Thegovernator
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Tom crooz or a whale fo prazuhdint ov dah cuntree

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/23/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 488 times Debate No: 63805
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

Thegovernator

Pro

Prezuhdint needs tuu be abul tu sweem
BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird

Con

Tom cruise can swim and he's not fat and he's tom cruise so tom cruise should be president cauz he's the bomb
Debate Round No. 1
Thegovernator

Pro

Tom crooz is a bomb. Literally. And bombs aren't Gud foar da ehconuhmee
Debate Round No. 2
Thegovernator

Pro

Tom crooz can't crooz liek a whayl
BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird

Con

ur duamb you probably haver ebo;a
Debate Round No. 3
Thegovernator

Pro

Thegovernator forfeited this round.
BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird

Con

BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Thegovernator

Pro

Thegovernator forfeited this round.
BombDebaterLeeroyTheBird

Con

You forfeited twice. Therefore, I win.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
This is the worst legitimate debate I have ever seen.
Posted by Thegovernator 2 years ago
Thegovernator
Wat
Posted by TheodoretheMan 2 years ago
TheodoretheMan
Is this a joke? Can one's spelling and grammar be so bad?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by numberwang 2 years ago
numberwang
ThegovernatorBombDebaterLeeroyTheBirdTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con ad hom'ed pro and said he had ebola, and ff'ed one round so that makes conduct null. S&G to con for obvious reasons. Pros argument that TC is a bomb and bombs are bad for the economy went unchallenged, as did the point the he can't cruise like a whale. Therefore pro wins arguments
Vote Placed by SeventhProfessor 2 years ago
SeventhProfessor
ThegovernatorBombDebaterLeeroyTheBirdTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro probably has ebola
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
ThegovernatorBombDebaterLeeroyTheBirdTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Con. Even though both forfeited rounds, Pro forfeited more rounds than Con. I suggest that you both try to manage the time accordingly because a forfeited round is an automatic loss of conduct points. S&G - Con. Pro had horrendous spelling and grammar throughout. I believe he was trolling but still, it was terrible. Con kinda divulges into this rancid behavior as well towards the end, but on balance Con had better spelling. Arguments - Con. Pro presented some interesting arguments, but lacked all forms of evidence to validate those claims. Con rebutted these claims with somewhat reasonable responses. For this, Con wins arguments. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.