Transgender: right or wrong?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 12 votes the winner is...
InVinoVeritas
| Started: | 2/21/2012 | Category: | Society |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 5,842 times | Debate No: | 21334 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (8)
Votes (12)
|
I am Pro, supporting the right to transgender If you except this challenge then you will be Con: arguing that transgender is wrong. good luck, CON
I accept. |
![]() |
|
Con has accepted this debate now and will be expected to produce counter-points to the reasons i give for transgender being allowed. Firstly: What is transgender: Identified with a gender other than the biological one (transvestite e.g. one who has a sex change operation) Why should it be allowed? [1] Sometimes a persons outside doesnt reflect who they are on the inside. ? [2] Many individuals dont have the personal strength to accept theyre that gender, some people believe they were born the wrong sex and many cases, people have committed suicide because they cannot take the blow of how mainstream society reacts to people who want to be different by changing their gender because they dont like who they are on the outside.
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu... To finish off my first arguement: i think that it is extremely ignorant to assume that it isnt normal for some people to be born with the wrong mindset for their gender (non matching to almost say) |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
i have given my arguement and i am waiting for you to be bothered to counter it, you're the one holding up this debate as you have not responded to my first case. please respond to it
I refuse to argue against a copy-and-pasted argument. Sorry. If the voters feel as though the opponent should win for his plagiarized argument, they can go ahead. I don't care. |
![]() |
|
well thank you for ruining this debate
No, actually, thank you. Thank you for ruining DDO with your plagiarized garbage. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by InVinoVeritas 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by phantom 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Zaradi 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by nonentity 1 year ago
Report this Comment
Posted by kyro90 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by girg 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by DevonNetzley 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by kyro90 1 year ago

Report this Comment
12 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Fusionized 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Countering alkid96 :)
Vote Placed by alkid96 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Everyone has the right to be happy and be their TRUE selves
Vote Placed by larztheloser 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for plagiarism. Arguments because only one side made any. Sources because only one side had any. Its ok to point out something is garbage, but thats not an excuse to abandon an argument.
Vote Placed by phantom 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - plagiarizing and refusing to construct own arguments _ S/G - Bad _ Arguments - I'm not going to accept pros plagiarized arguments especially as con asked him to make his own, but he did not. Con never made any so tied. _ Sources - Pro could have at least acknowledged he C/P'd his entire round.
Vote Placed by SuburbiaSurvivor 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Don't be plagiarizing, doe.
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: zaradi has the right policy regarding this. Pro does get arguments but all other points go to the con since the pro plagiarized.
Vote Placed by nonentity 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro copied and pasted his argument from another source. Con presumably accepted this debate under the impression he would be debating pro, and not some outside source. And plagiarism is complete academic dishonesty (whether he cited the original source or not, copy and pasting large walls of text is still plagiarism)
Vote Placed by wiploc 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by vmpire321 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Not necessarily plagiarism - PRO gave proper credit.
ANd Con. Even IF he plagiarizes, you should have at least formed your own arguments to win. The debate isn't based on you refuting, but rather both sides forming their own cases. Pro had some arguments.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 1 year ago
| jawyer | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: I hate judging these kinds of rounds. On one hand, I give arguments to pro because he gave some sort of argument that, regardless, con should've attempted to refute. But since the arguments were plagiarized, I give all other points to con. Plagiarizing arguments is a major no-no.














