Debate Rounds (3)
I suppose we can do it and get what we need also. Just take the decisions wisely. For example,we should wait the autumn when each nestling grown up. Before cutting the tree check whether it is free of any animals,otherwise to move them to another place. It is not difficult to do just be attentive and wise.
What i wanted to add
1. we ought to pay attention to silviculture in order to renewal forests.
2. Increase the period of time for forest life. In Belarus the formed forest is a fifty-year-old forest. It is too little time for renewal of life. Comparing to the czarist time it is only a have of period.
3. The cost of wood can be raised (for the majority of people it is the only way to learn that they should save nature)
In the words of Rage Against the Machine, "Burn! Burn! Yes, you're gonna burn!"
Do you think we can use nature ruthlessly??
If we want to inhabit this planet for ages we should think about the nature now. In 50 years it will be too late. I am talking not about forests, but also water, animals,plants.
xxxantichristxxx forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.