The Instigator
Adam2
Pro (for)
Winning
24 Points
The Contender
Gogert777
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Types like George Juergens make horrible fathers and father-in-laws

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Adam2
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/17/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 711 times Debate No: 56767
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (6)
Votes (5)

 

Adam2

Pro

I will argue that types like Juergens makes both horrible fathers and father-in-laws.
Gogert777

Con

I totally agree.
Debate Round No. 1
Adam2

Pro

If you agree, then what's the point of this debate?
Gogert777

Con

My mom watched the show and she said "He is ok, watch on of the episodes".
I enter this debate for one reason, to win.
Debate Round No. 2
Adam2

Pro

OK here's what makes him bad
He is a womanizer http://secretlife.wikia.com...
He cheated on his wife
and he's just plain arrogant. He thinks the world revolves around him!
Gogert777

Con

You as a individual care about a character's behavior in a series, I get that I guess. I for one am fascinated about psychedelics and I have my reasons for that. They are illegal for bullsh*t reasons and are perfectly safe, and what they do to conciseness is absurdly, infinitely profound to me. (Maybe because I have been sober for 17 y, 11 m, 364 h, and 30 min of my entire life)

I don't know if your little series is over, but maybe he will have a strong change of heart :0
Maybe he will become a monk in the himalayas.
If you really don't like to see the bad in humans, stay with your regular drama shows,
but not ones that involve families so you can't be unset. (Weeds, 24 hours, A ordinary family etc)

P.S, if have a Netflix subscription, i recommend DMT: the spirit molecule
Namaste
Debate Round No. 3
Adam2

Pro

You as a individual care about a character's behavior in a series, I get that I guess. I for one am fascinated about psychedelics and I have my reasons for that. They are illegal for bullsh*t reasons and are perfectly safe, and what they do to conciseness is absurdly, infinitely profound to me. (Maybe because I have been sober for 17 y, 11 m, 364 h, and 30 min of my entire life)
Actually, no. I actually have a curiosity about types like them. I came upon his character and he reminded me of fellas like that who I've had to deal with in the past.

I don't know if your little series is over, but maybe he will have a strong change of heart :0
http://en.wikipedia.org...
It's an actual series. I gave a link already (didn't you read it?)

As I have concluded... types like him should never be considered a good role model in society.
Gogert777

Con

It's cool how you are concerned for role models affecting the children. All you can do is hope. I think we (the usa) should get our education system and economy inline first, then to other frontiers(Like space!)

You should start a George 2014 like Kony 2012

YOU CAN DO IT
Thank you for this talk/debate thing, i'm new here and i am like it so far. Have a good one.
VOTE CON!
Debate Round No. 4
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Gogert777 3 years ago
Gogert777
Not really a troll but it turned out that way.
Posted by Gogert777 3 years ago
Gogert777
Im losing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Adam2 3 years ago
Adam2
lannan13
Yeah you're right ,it ain't really a source, but at least it's something as opposed to nothing
Not everyone on wikipedia is dumb, though the majority are.
Posted by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
Wikipeadia is not a source.
Posted by Adam2 3 years ago
Adam2
Oh man, tell me about it.
I've had to deal with guys like that
If I dated a white girl, my father (Hispanic) would never treat her, the way my father-in-law would treat me.
Posted by ayreslandscapesvcs 3 years ago
ayreslandscapesvcs
:) Its happen many time.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
Adam2Gogert777Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: con conceded in the first round
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Adam2Gogert777Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: A poor troll by con.
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
Adam2Gogert777Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession.
Vote Placed by schachdame 3 years ago
schachdame
Adam2Gogert777Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Trolling and conceding.
Vote Placed by ChosenWolff 3 years ago
ChosenWolff
Adam2Gogert777Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded