The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
SmallTacos
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Tyrants do not accept messages as they know it all already.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
SmallTacos
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/22/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 724 times Debate No: 60813
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (14)
Votes (3)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

What I have found on this site is that the most dedicated debaters, and the smartest in their own mind almost always, do not vote on the big issues, or accept messages. They are conceited tyrants. They wish to not have to hear the masses, only dictate their opinion.
SmallTacos

Con

No, it might be that they just don't like to answer messages. What they voice their opinions on has nothing to do with tyranny, unless they're an authoritarian, and they have no authority over you whatsoever on this site. You could argue for their aristocracy and bigotry, but not tyranny. Maybe they don't want to answer you or debate you because it's been debated by them before. You say "almost always". How much of a percentage is that? What would you consider "most", and how could you tell if they are self-righteous? Your argument appeals to emotion, not logic. You have made an ad-hominem argument as well. Please, do not invoke emotion into your arguments, or use logical fallacies.
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

Message senders are potential tyrants, is that your supposition? Fear of opinions is mine, hence the debate.
SmallTacos

Con

Tyranny is out of the question. They are not oppressing you. My supposition is that they are not tyrants, merely bigoted or unresponsive.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

I agree, well put.
SmallTacos

Con

Well then, so there is no more argument, I suppose this debate is over.
Debate Round No. 3
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
fuggetaboutit.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
I meant what I wrote, thank you for your concern, it is unneeded.
Posted by SmallTacos 2 years ago
SmallTacos
You mean Aerogant.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
I regret my last statement, as it only makes you more arrogant.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
holy crap, open ions? you are awesome!
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
They are called opinion, not openions for a reason - he who shuts himself out, is he who is runs in the dark; he who acts while in the dark, is he who runs in the dark with dangerous tools in hand.
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
Those who speak are ignorant - those who seek are intelligent.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Why is the finger white?
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
only a tyrat would suggest you have to answer every message.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
great comments! thanks! ever heard that here?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
Max.WallaceSmallTacosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: concession
Vote Placed by Bennett91 2 years ago
Bennett91
Max.WallaceSmallTacosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Same as YaHey.
Vote Placed by YaHey 2 years ago
YaHey
Max.WallaceSmallTacosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro conceded popular debaters are not tyrants.