U.S. Military is Better than Russian Military
Debate Round Forfeited
Kazierno has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
|Voting Style:||Open||Point System:||7 Point|
|Updated:||5 days ago||Status:||Debating Period|
|Viewed:||111 times||Debate No:||96220|
Debate Rounds (3)
So, I think this is a good topic to debate about so we can prove for a fact around here that who among the the two superpowers is the better one.
There will be 3 rounds, with a maximum writing of 10,000 characters including spaces.
1. Rules (me)/ Argument (opponent)
2. Arguments (me)/ Rebuttals (opponent)
3. Rebuttals (me)/ Defense (opponent)
4. Defense (me)/ Rebuttals for defense and conclusion (opponent)
5. Rebuttals for defense and conclusion (me)/ Waive (opponent
No forfeits because of the FF glitch, no trolling, no semantics, and K's. Sources can be in an external link, but arguments need to be in the argument text.
MY STARTING LINES
I believe that Russia, when it was actually called a SuperPower, is still very good in their original form, and from my point of view is probably better than the U.S. Military. U.S.A. is usually all about show-off, and most of its new technology, especially in Military Regions, is not for real use, but kept for show. But, Russia is better than that.
A MESSAGE TO THE OPPONENT
I WISH you the best of luck, and I hope that there is nothing other to do here than Debate.
While various setbacks in the war on terror underscore the limits of American power, it is important not to lose sight of the bigger picture: we live in the age of American supremacy. Part of the explanation for U.S. dominance surely lies in America"s economic strength. But Europe and Japan are similarly wealthy, yet their global sway lags far behind. What they lack is America"s superior military capabilities. Although the dominance of U.S. forces can still be challenged when they come into close contact with the enemy on his home turf, they are undisputed masters of the "commons" (sea, air, and space), which allows them to project power anywhere in the world at short notice.
Information technology is central to American military dominance. Not all of the changes wrought by the information age are obvious at first glance, because the basic military systems of the early twenty-first century look roughly similar to their predecessors of the second industrial age " tanks, planes, aircraft carriers, missiles. The average speed of a U.S. Navy destroyer has not increased in the past 100 years. The U.S. Air Force continues to rely on B-52H bombers last built in 1962. And the Marine Corps still uses helicopters that flew in the Vietnam War. But since the mid-1970s, the communications, targeting, surveillance, and ordnance technologies that make such "legacy" systems considerably more potent have been changing with great rapidity " and to America"s great advantage.
Yet in this period of American hegemony, Americans continue to feel vulnerable. As we learned on September 11, and continue learning on the battlefields of Iraq, the most advanced weapons systems and most sophisticated information technology are hardly a perfect shield against other kinds of destructive power. The paradox of our age is that modern technology is both the great separator and the great equalizer in military affairs: Technological supremacy separates America from the rest of the world, and yet modern technology leaves America vulnerable to vicious groups and gangs armed with AK47s, car bombs, or portable WMDs. To understand the future of warfare, we need to understand both sides of this paradox: specifically, how information technology has increased America"s conventional military supremacy (in land, sea, air, and space), and how this military edge may be subverted by determined radicals armed with new technologies of death.
Also, you may think that we are living in the time of American supremacy, but it is Russia, who is secretly doing the development. Also, because of the U.S. claims of Russian attacks on Germany which were FALSE, Russia's USSR fell and it had to pay a huge amount, which faltered the former's economy. Otherwise, the biggest gainer from WWII was Russia. Also, if in a war, Russia would rather not attack, because at home Russia has an advantage of temperature, and it is for a fact that American guns will freeze in a few hours time.
Plus, you cannot be one to deny, that Russia has WAY MORE Nuclear Warheads than the United States. And for a fact, the total number of warheads U.S. has is the actual number of ACTIVE Russian Nuclear Warheads. Russia has nearly double the amount of Warheads that U.S. has.
ALso, we all are supposed to know that the U.S. military has the largest navy, but why? It is because countries like Russia and U.K. and France and Germany and India and China, dumped nearly all their Navy after the 1960s thinking that they wanted more new tech. But, Half of U.S.'s navy is currently from WWII, and from the 19 carriers they have, 3 were stolen from Japan, 1 was taken from China and 2 more from U.K.. Now, if the other countries had done the same thing, they would've had a larger navy than U.S.. Also, we know that Russia's air force is larger than America's. Also, perceiving the size of Russia, it would be nearly impossible to gather intel as fast as attacking.
Also, U.S. may have more number of troops, but Russia's reserve is larger, and also Russia's overall Defense budget is also larger. Overall, US international debt is more than Russia, and Russia is a larger arms exporter to overall countries than the US. Plus, Russia has more next-gen fighters compared to as the United States of America, which they actually put to use. Also, Russia is more experienced in Battle situations.
I will be expecting a good rebuttal to this, according to the rules. Thank you.
America's biggest conventional military advantage is its fleet of 19 aircraft carriers, compared to 12 carriers operated by the rest of the world combined. These massive carriers allow the U.S. to set up forward operating bases anywhere and project power throughout the world.
So Russia may have more man-power, but when it comes to it, the U.S excels in all other aspects.
But, America still ends up using 1 carrier from WWII. Also, Russia is building 4 more aircraft carriers by Sept. 2017, which you might not know, and so is U.K., my country of origin. Also, you might think that America is politically stable, but it is not even close to it. America's current political condition, has faltered its ability to make better allies. Also, Russia, if it went to war, it will have allies like China and North Korea and Israel, Germany and Pakistan for sure, all of them being Nuclear-Capable war, while U.s. will have U.K., France, Canada, Australia, Japan and a few chances with India.
This round has not been posted yet.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click thelink at the top of the page.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.