The Instigator
sweatycreases2
Pro (for)
Losing
15 Points
The Contender
Yraelz
Con (against)
Winning
51 Points

UNDER THE BELOW LISTED RULES MY OPPONENT WILL LOSE THIS DEBATE.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2008 Category: Religion
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,895 times Debate No: 3452
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (20)
Votes (22)

 

sweatycreases2

Pro

MY OPPONENT WAS THE CHALLENGER IN THE PREVIOUS "UNDER THE BELOW LISTED RULES MY OPPONENT WILL LOSE THIS DEBATE", SO I THOUGH IT WOULD BE A GOOD TOPIC TO CHALLENGE HIM WITH SINCE HE STATES IN HIS PROFILE PAGE THAT "I believe any position can be advocated for successfully it just requires a little persuasion."

IN THAT CASE, HERE ARE THE RULES I AM LAYING DOWN FOR THIS DEBATE:

1) MY OPPONENT IS NOT ALLOWED TO ARGUE IN THIS DEBATE IN SUCH A WAY THAT COULD BE ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE POSSIBILITY OF HIM GETTING VOTES FOR ANY REASON, BE IT IN A CONVINCING MANNER, OR OTHERWISE.

2) MY OPPONENT IS NOT ALLOWED TO USE LETTERS IN HIS ARGUMENTS, ONLY NUMBERS.

3) MY OPPONENT IS NOT PERMITTED TO SUBMIT ANY ARGUMENTS UNTIL THE LAST ROUND.

4) MY OPPONENT MUST LEVITATE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE DEBATE WITHOUT TOUCHING ANYTHING BUT HIS KEYBOARD.

HATS OFF TO MY OPPONENT IF HE ACCEPTS THIS DEBATE, LET ALONE WINS IT.
Yraelz

Con

The resolution quite clearly states that, "UNDER THE BELOW LISTED RULES MY OPPONENT WILL LOSE THIS DEBATE." Luckily for me, my opponent has not prevented me from making rules, thus I may.

5. If any of the 5 rules are broken by the Con then he automatically wins this debate.

Thanks.
Debate Round No. 1
20 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by SweetBags 8 years ago
SweetBags
hes an egotistical self rightious jackass whos convinced that hes always right (hes usually not) and if you disagree with him your "to young to understand".
Posted by sweatycreases2 8 years ago
sweatycreases2
IVE SEEN SOLARMAN ON HERE. WHY DOESN'T ANYONE LIKE HIM?
Posted by A-ThiestSocialist 8 years ago
A-ThiestSocialist
is solarman still on here? That retard.
Posted by Yraelz 8 years ago
Yraelz
Hehehe.... I don't know if clever was the right adjective.
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 8 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
"is this the new solarman?
"

No, solarman isn't as clever.
Posted by SweetBags 8 years ago
SweetBags
pro, dont type in all caps, its kinda annoying.
con, nice loophole catch
pro, i beleive you now lack a hat
Posted by Pluto2493 8 years ago
Pluto2493
is this the new solarman?
Posted by leethal 8 years ago
leethal
Not true, creases - Con's rule ensured that if he broke ANY of the rules you put down, he is automatically the winner. You had nothing in your debate saying that if Con broke any of the rules, he was the loser.
Posted by sweatycreases2 8 years ago
sweatycreases2
DOESN'T MATTER, CON WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE BEEN LEVITATING IN ORDER TO MAKE A RULE IN THE FIRST PLACE
Posted by leethal 8 years ago
leethal
Well pointed out, Ragnar. Sweatycreases should have added "5) Failure to abide by any of the rules stated in this opening argument will result in complete forfeit."
22 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by jiffy 8 years ago
jiffy
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by keenan 8 years ago
keenan
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Gao 8 years ago
Gao
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by liberalconservative 8 years ago
liberalconservative
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by HadenQuinlan 8 years ago
HadenQuinlan
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by run-ons_maker 8 years ago
run-ons_maker
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by left_wing_mormon 8 years ago
left_wing_mormon
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Rakdos 8 years ago
Rakdos
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by SweetBags 8 years ago
SweetBags
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by meganlg43 8 years ago
meganlg43
sweatycreases2YraelzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03