The Instigator
Masterful
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
btrxscopez
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Ugly people should be mutilated. (Ad hominem attacks are welcome, in fact encouraged.)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/30/2017 Category: People
Updated: 7 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 514 times Debate No: 102828
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (0)

 

Masterful

Pro

Just a quick debated concerning ugly people.

By ugly what I mean is the repulsively ugly people. The genetically defunct, anus for a face looking mother f****rs. There should be no debate as to what ugly means, nor anything about how "subjective" being ugly is. Ugly is ugly, don"t try to justify natures hideous eyesores. You will be defending the ugly peoples right, not to be mutilated.
btrxscopez

Con

I accept your debate.

For a start you present no valid reason for why 'ugly people' should be mutilated, this in it's self gives me more than enough material to have an argument as unjustified harming or killing is a crime, and even if it is justified it can still be considered so, but I will continue.

Regardless if someone is ugly, disabled ect they are still Human, and that means they have rights. Attacking someone on the grounds of their appearance is breaching their Human rights and so is wrong.
Debate Round No. 1
Masterful

Pro

Many religions of today mutilate young babies by cutting off their foreskin. This is un-justified and does not benefit the baby at all. However, this shows mutilation is legal and is an on-going practice.

My proposal is to mutilate the genitalia of ugly people just enough so that they cannot reproduce; this is because ugly people produce ugly offspring. How unfair it is to bring a child into this world who will have to live the rest of their life as an ugly outcast, this is truly barbaric! This is borderline child abuse, why should children have to be born ugly? We have many beautiful children in the world that need to be adopted, if ugly people want children, then they should adopt, not bring more uglies into the world.

It is every parent's responsibility to give their child the best start in life, if said parent fails to meet this responsibility and decide to make an ugly baby, despite knowing that baby will look ugly and thus disadvantaged in life, then it's clear they're not fit to reproduce. Thus we should remove their mating privileges.

To argue for ugly people being allowed to brood babies is to overlook what is best for the baby. Being ugly is not what's best for the baby.

let's make a difference and mutilate the genitalia of uglies.
btrxscopez

Con

"Many religions of today mutilate young babies by cutting off their foreskin. This is un-justified and does not benefit the baby at all. However, this shows mutilation is legal and is an on-going practice."

This is due to the Religious reasons behind it, this argument cannot be used to justify the mutilation of unwilling victims as this is a completely different, unjustified situation. It is also still illegal to attack and mutilate someone.

"My proposal is to mutilate the genitalia of ugly people just enough so that they cannot reproduce; this is because ugly people produce ugly offspring. How unfair it is to bring a child into this world who will have to live the rest of their life as an ugly outcast, this is truly barbaric! This is borderline child abuse, why should children have to be born ugly? We have many beautiful children in the world that need to be adopted, if ugly people want children, then they should adopt, not bring more uglies into the world."

Ugly people, as you call them, do not necessarily pass on their traits, there defects could be non-genetic or their partner's genes could take prominence. Regardless ugly people are on a whole not treated differently in society and can still be very productive, because of this mutilating anyone based on their appearance is completely unjustified.

"To argue for ugly people being allowed to brood babies is to overlook what is best for the baby. Being ugly is not what's best for the baby.

let's make a difference and mutilate the genitalia of uglies."

Preventing babies from being born by using population controls is also not whats best for babies, but you gloss over that don't you?

You also completely ignore my argument about Human rights, it's quite clear you can't justify your points.
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Crazy456Rhino 7 months ago
Crazy456Rhino
Welp, I'm ugly.

But at least I have fabulous hair! I can pass it down to make a generation of babies with beautiful hair! XP
Posted by Masterful 7 months ago
Masterful
Being ugly is not always subjective, hence why typically beautiful people date beautiful people and why ugly people date ugly people.

The act of disfiguring (removing foreskin) is by definition mutilation.
Posted by hotsauce2910 7 months ago
hotsauce2910
Hold up... mutilating genitalia and removing foreskin are fairly different. Also, ugly is something which is subjunctive and can be changed.
Posted by btrxscopez 7 months ago
btrxscopez
"My example of human babies being mutilated directly concerns human rights, you completely justified mutilation by staying "there are religious reason behind this"""

Mutilation in that sense is mostly justified as there are religious and cultural reasons behind the act, also the removal of foreskin does little harm to the body, at least compared to completely destroying an organ, as you suggest.

""This is due to the Religious reasons behind it, this argument cannot be used to justify the mutilation of unwilling victims"

So the babies are willing victims? Lmao"

As I said the reasons behind it justify this type of mutilation mostly as it is harmless. Admittedly some religiously driven mutilation is harmful, but this is almost always done illegally.
Posted by Masterful 7 months ago
Masterful
My example of human babies being mutilated directly concerns human rights, you completely justified mutilation by staying "there are religious reason behind this"
Posted by Masterful 7 months ago
Masterful
"This is due to the Religious reasons behind it, this argument cannot be used to justify the mutilation of unwilling victims"

So the babies are willing victims? Lmao
No votes have been placed for this debate.