The Instigator
African
Con (against)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
IceHawk2009
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

Unhappiness have nothing to do with having no money in life

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
IceHawk2009
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/16/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 508 times Debate No: 46076
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

African

Con

Money talks
IceHawk2009

Pro

I accept the challenge. I will let you post your first argument.
Debate Round No. 1
African

Con

Having more money means an exellent life. You will be taking care of yourself properly.Do you know why tata Mandela rechead 94 years. Its because of money. Money determines state of mind of a person
IceHawk2009

Pro

Rates of depression among young rich kids are higher than the normal[1].

There have been rich depressed people[2].

You're arguing from incredulity you have no idea why he lived so long.

Long lives does not mean happy.

Debate Round No. 2
African

Con

I have never heard of these children in africa
IceHawk2009

Pro

IceHawk2009 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
African

Con

Happiness is a state of mind
IceHawk2009

Pro

IceHawk2009 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
African

Con

African forfeited this round.
IceHawk2009

Pro

IceHawk2009 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by ILL_logic 3 years ago
ILL_logic
con should not be debating this issue
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
AfricanIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's strong round 2 argument was: 1) Never addressed by Con 2) Far stronger than any of Con's arguments. Conduct to Con for Pro forfeiting first. Sources to Pro, although they weren't scholarly work, they backed up his/her arguments quite well.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
AfricanIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: More rounds forfeited by Pro.