The Instigator
BehindYou
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
SolSun
Con (against)
Losing
11 Points

Unicorns Are Real

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
BehindYou
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/27/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,025 times Debate No: 51094
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (6)

 

BehindYou

Pro

UNICORNS ARE REAL I SWEAR IT. They are the most amazing creatures to ever live I used to ride one ti school everyday and I turn into one every night and stab people with my horn THEY ARE REAL.
SolSun

Con

Do you have any REAL proof that unicorns are real?
Debate Round No. 1
BehindYou

Pro

Yes they do, thousands of people report unicorn sighting everyday around the world. Plus if you see a rainbow cookie like thing do not eat it! It is unicorn waste. Ye shall not interfere with unicorn functions.
SolSun

Con

Send me a link to a picture of a unicorn and a video of a unicorn sighting.
Debate Round No. 2
SolSun

Con

Make a second debate, but make it 5 rounds instead.
And in the second unicorn one, give me evidence that that horn on the horse isn't programmed.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by BananaPhilosopher 3 years ago
BananaPhilosopher
BehindYouSolSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: In response to all who have voted for Pro because con didn't DISPROVE unicorns, I'd like to point out a concept called Russel's Tea Pot. You CANNOT prove ANYTHING doesn't exist. You can prove it's unlikely to exist, but not that it doesn't. It's unreasonable to even ask him to try. In this debate, it couldn't move forward until pro provided evidence for his claims, which he refused to do. Con did the right thing by asking pro to provide evidence, but, as pointed out, could have done a better job showing why Pro lost this debate unless he COULD provide the necessary evidence. Nonetheless, none of Con's arguments were actually illogical, just incomplete. As such, he wins the better argument. He had better grammar, and is awarded that point. Sources goes to con as well, because pro's source was in no way reputable proof, and it's impossible for Con to provide PROOF that something DOESNT exist. Neither positions should have received source points, but since pro did, it's more fair this way
Vote Placed by philochristos 3 years ago
philochristos
BehindYouSolSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: It wasn't much of a debate, but Con clearly did have better S&G.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
BehindYouSolSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:51 
Reasons for voting decision: con failed.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
BehindYouSolSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't refute any of pro's arguments.
Vote Placed by sewook123 3 years ago
sewook123
BehindYouSolSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't state why and how unicorns are not real. He merely made weak rebuttals. No source point as I don't view youtube as a reliable source.
Vote Placed by Pokemonzr 3 years ago
Pokemonzr
BehindYouSolSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:21 
Reasons for voting decision: Ok, so, this wasn't exactly... well... a real debate. However, I did award some points. Spelling and grammar points go to Con for obvious reasons. Source points o to Pro because he cited a digitally edited video of a unicorn.