The Instigator
Smurfy
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
Inductivelogic
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

User Mikal has a second account, inductivelogic, that always votes for him.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Smurfy
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/19/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,734 times Debate No: 35776
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (15)
Votes (4)

 

Smurfy

Pro

First round is for arguments.

Here is some overwhelming circumstancial evidence supporting my assertion.

Mikal has won 11/11 of his debates. Impressive. Until we look at his profile and notice a "friend" named inductivelogic who seems to always be involved with Mikal.

Proof #1:Inductivelogic has voted in 9 out of 11 of Mikal's debates, the other two debates involving Mikal vs. inductivelogic, meaning inductivelogic wasn't eligible to vote. However, he did make it pretty obvious that he was debating himself as i'll show the conversation below

Proof #2: Inductivelogic has voted in Mikal's favor 100% of the time.That's right. In all 9 debates in which he was eligible to vote, Inductivelogic has given Mikal the vote.

Proof #3:Inductivelogic's only friend is Mikal. Not only is it extremely unusual for inductivelogic to have been voting in all of Mikals debates, especially always in Mikals favor, but his only friend is one that has exremely high voting involvement for Mikal.

Proof #4: Inductivelogic's personal info including relationship status, ethnicity, ideology ect are all basically opposite of Mikals. One thing in particular, inductivelogic's religion is listed as Deism, and Mikal's religion status is Atheist.

Inductivelogics only friend

Picture hosted by Pixentral

Inductivelogics info

Picture hosted by Pixentral
Link to this picture http://s23.postimg.org...

Mikals info
Picture hosted by Pixentral
Link to this picture: http://s16.postimg.org...

Next, here are 9 of the 11 debates in which inductivelogic was eligible to vote in, the other 2 were against inductivelogic. I'll present my evidence and see if you think those 2 debates seemed fake (for the purpose of granting Mikal easy wins). I've shortened the title of Mika's won debates for simplicity but feel free to see them through Mikals account - I provided a link to both accounts below.

objective morality

Picture hosted by Pixentral

is there a god

Picture hosted by Pixentral

hundreds years old

Picture hosted by Pixentral

gun control

Picture hosted by Pixentral

gay marriage

Picture hosted by Pixentral

college basketball

Picture hosted by Pixentral

Christianity harm

Picture hosted by Pixentral

bible true

Picture hosted by Pixentral

Semi auto ban

Picture hosted by Pixentral

In the 2 out of 11 debates Inductivelogic didn't vote for Mikal, were against Mikal. See if you think this isn't a fake conversation. Obviously, the outcome was meant for Mikal to win.

Conversation 1: http://s23.postimg.org...

Conversation 2: http://s13.postimg.org...

In conclusion: I am asserting that 1) inductivelogic is Mikal's second account and 2) that inductivelogic is an account meant to benefit Mikal by voting for him and letting him win debates.

If you doubt any of my information I have posted on their accounts, here is a link to them.

Mikals account: http://www.debate.org...

Inductivelogics account: http://www.debate.org...

****NOTE: All of this information is accurate as of Friday, July 19 1:25pm. I would not be surprised if this topic makes him cover his tracks.
Inductivelogic

Con

I wish he would have took this lol.

To clear the question, i know him personally in real life. I use to live down the street from him before he moved. I also have docked him points in debates and he has beaten me in a few. Which is why he the only person on my list at the moment because I added him. He talked me into making an account and I enjoy see how people think. I don't see how I could cover my tracks where as this the case. Hypothecially even if it were true, I do not have the time to offer debates on two accounts lol.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts though.

Since this is opinonated I will forfit the rest of the rounds, just thought I would clear that up <3
Debate Round No. 1
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Shadowguynick 4 years ago
Shadowguynick
I think I have voted in favor of Mikal a lot too.
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
Given that this was pro's first debate, I wonder who he's an alt for?
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
@Sweetbreeze: In windows click Start Menu / All Programs / Accessories / Snipping Tool.
Posted by sweetbreeze 4 years ago
sweetbreeze
Could someone please teach me how to make screen shots?
Posted by orangemayhem 4 years ago
orangemayhem
Hang on. I've just noticed that Smurfy has only just joined DDO. A complete newbie would never have come across this by accident. Did you join DDO just so you could torch these two?

On another note, since it would appear that this accusation is false, I would recommend that Mikal and inductivelogic send this to Airmax as libelous.

The one final thing I'll say is that, while you two might not be multi-accounting, voting for your friend is also against the TOS, so you probably shouldn't vote for each other in future.
Posted by Inductivelogic 4 years ago
Inductivelogic
LOL I never even mentioned God anywhere in those messages. I merely stated that murder was morally justifiable without a God. I choose not to "articulate" anything on here because I do not take this site seriously. I made it just to see different view points and to mess around. Michael however takes stuff way to seriously, so I do enjoy keeping up with some of the arguments/debates he gets into on Facebook. I figured if he could post things about God, abortion, and prostitution on facebook and get that kind of response, it would quite interesting to see what happened on here.

I have no idea what kind of nonsense you are spitting out about me mentioning a God. I will assume you can not read, or were assuming the picture at the top was me as well. This I would totally believe seeing as how you like to "assume" stuff. You know what they say about assuming. It makes an "a$$" out of "u" and "me".
Posted by Smurfy 4 years ago
Smurfy
The person in the Facebook pic seems to articulate his position on God much better than he did on conversation #2 of my linked pic.
Posted by Inductivelogic 4 years ago
Inductivelogic
Thanks for not posting my name for picture lol. Wish that I would have thought to post that
Posted by Mikal 4 years ago
Mikal
Also this will show that I am serious lol. I blacked out his name and Pic because he doesn't want people to know it

<img src="http://i44.tinypic.com/if4geu.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic">

[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com...[/IMG]

http://i44.tinypic.com...

One of this should work. I posted it 3 different ways, so there would be no question and to make sure it actually showed up
Posted by Mikal 4 years ago
Mikal
Also this will show that I am serious lol. I blacked out his name and Pic because he doesn't want people to know it

<img src="http://i44.tinypic.com/if4geu.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic">

[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com...[/IMG]

http://i44.tinypic.com...

One of this should work. I posted it 3 different ways, so there would be no question and to make sure it actually showed up
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
SmurfyInductivelogicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: While I believe con, pro's argument remains superior to DDO voting criteria, and is well researched (a ton of sources). "Since this is opinonated I will forfit the rest of the rounds" attempting to forfeit the remaining rounds in a single round debate, that was a pretty decent joke. Spelling was a little rough, but not enough to sway that voting area... Perhaps worst of all, is semantically there is little difference between if he personally clicks the votes, or gets a friend to do it, such would still be in many senses his. (this really should have been more than a single round)
Vote Placed by MrJosh 4 years ago
MrJosh
SmurfyInductivelogicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO didn't argue his case well enough to earn points for it
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
SmurfyInductivelogicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Lol that's all I have to say is lol....Mikal is the only voter and making Con the winner who is supposed to be Mikal according to Pro...I find this very amusing, Sorry Pro. Maybe they are friends, it's highly possible, maybe you should have worded the debate by stating that there is foul play between the two, I find it very unusual that Inductivelogic would vote so highly in Mikal's favour on so many occasions, But it is what it is, and not enough to prove they are the same person, maybe Airmax is the right person to approach for that.
Vote Placed by Mikal 4 years ago
Mikal
SmurfyInductivelogicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: I will try to judge this without Bias since I am the one in question. See comments in case this link does not post, but it shows he is a another person. So arguments to con, because he has shown this true. Sources to Con since he had some. I wish I would have taken this since i could have posted this as a source. This will show and offer clarfication and demonstrate he is a second person. This would have been better stated if you would have said, My friend could possibly be bias. Maybe that is arguable but it is subjective. http://tinypic.com/r/if4geu/5