The Instigator
Zak9
Con (against)
Tied
6 Points
The Contender
unfortunate
Pro (for)
Tied
6 Points

Using animals as resources is morally justifiable.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/23/2011 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 609 times Debate No: 19449
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Zak9

Con

My opponent, Pro, must prove that using other non-human creatures can be morally justified.

Round 1: Acceptance.
Round 2: State first points.
Rounds 3: Contradict opponent's points and make futher ones.
Round 4: Same as Round 3.
Rounds 5: Same as Round 4.

I hope I get an intelligent person that will not continually forfeit like my past two opponents. Good luck!
unfortunate

Pro

Hello, I'd be glad to debate this
Firstly, though, I'd like you to define "using as resources". Are you referring to experiments detrimental to another creature's health..
Also "non-human" creatures is very wide open and may include single celled organisms, I take it you're referring to slightly more complex organisms with a more advanced central nervous system capable of a wider range of senses?
Debate Round No. 1
Zak9

Con

Zak9 forfeited this round.
unfortunate

Pro

unfortunate forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Zak9

Con

Zak9 forfeited this round.
unfortunate

Pro

unfortunate forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Zak9

Con

Zak9 forfeited this round.
unfortunate

Pro

unfortunate forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Zak9

Con

Zak9 forfeited this round.
unfortunate

Pro

unfortunate forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by WriterSelbe 5 years ago
WriterSelbe
Zak9unfortunateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Tie because they both sucked.
Vote Placed by Boogerdoctor 5 years ago
Boogerdoctor
Zak9unfortunateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Clear winner
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
Zak9unfortunateTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: lol