The Instigator
abstractposters
Pro (for)
abstractposters
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
mohammad
Con (against)
mohammad
Winning
12 Points

Utopia already exists.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
mohammad
Started: 8/7/2012 Category: Religion
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 334 times Debate No: 25057
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

abstractposters

Pro

UTOPIA: An ideal and imaginary world.

Any takers?
Report this Argument
mohammad

Con

Religion is suppose to bring a utopia; however, it is just a myth.
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 1
abstractposters

Pro

The idea of a Heaven for those who are dead were myths that have now world-historically become science.
All science is myth.
Report this Argument
mohammad

Con

People before us who previously believed in heaven based it on fables and stories thus were not facts.
While science is built on facts which are proven hence science is not a myth
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 2
abstractposters

Pro

pass
Report this Argument
mohammad

Con

thank u for the great debate.
you have words of wisdom
plz add me
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 3
Post a Comment
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by WMdebate 9 months ago
WMdebate
I actually came to the complete opposite conclusion you did LaissezFaire...
Report this Comment
Posted by abstractposters 9 months ago
abstractposters
Complex math [real or WMdebate and imaginary or LaissezFaire] is welcome.
Report this Comment
Posted by LaissezFaire 9 months ago
LaissezFaire
With the definition of utopia including 'imaginary', it seems like it would be impossible for Pro to win.
Report this Comment
Posted by WMdebate 9 months ago
WMdebate
This one is tricky, Pro has some arguments.
Report this Comment
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by bencbartlett 9 months ago
bencbartlett
abstractpostersmohammadTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This, my friends, was a battle of the trolls. I see abstractposters has been banned; I was actually debating him, and he was, more or less, doing what he does best: trolling. Seriously though, this was a waste of a debate, and the topic actually wasn't too bad. Something is definitely wrong when the number of characters in a comment on a single vote can approximate the number of characters in the entire debate.
Vote Placed by Valkyrie 9 months ago
Valkyrie
abstractpostersmohammadTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: wow that wasnt exactly very in depth
Vote Placed by buckIPDA 9 months ago
buckIPDA
abstractpostersmohammadTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.