The Instigator
abstractposters
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
mohammad
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Utopia already exists.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
mohammad
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/7/2012 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 824 times Debate No: 25057
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

abstractposters

Pro

UTOPIA: An ideal and imaginary world.

Any takers?
mohammad

Con

Religion is suppose to bring a utopia; however, it is just a myth.
Debate Round No. 1
abstractposters

Pro

The idea of a Heaven for those who are dead were myths that have now world-historically become science.
All science is myth.
mohammad

Con

People before us who previously believed in heaven based it on fables and stories thus were not facts.
While science is built on facts which are proven hence science is not a myth
Debate Round No. 2
mohammad

Con

thank u for the great debate.
you have words of wisdom
plz add me
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by WMdebate 4 years ago
WMdebate
I actually came to the complete opposite conclusion you did LaissezFaire...
Posted by abstractposters 4 years ago
abstractposters
Complex math [real or WMdebate and imaginary or LaissezFaire] is welcome.
Posted by LaissezFaire 4 years ago
LaissezFaire
With the definition of utopia including 'imaginary', it seems like it would be impossible for Pro to win.
Posted by WMdebate 4 years ago
WMdebate
This one is tricky, Pro has some arguments.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by bencbartlett 4 years ago
bencbartlett
abstractpostersmohammadTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This, my friends, was a battle of the trolls. I see abstractposters has been banned; I was actually debating him, and he was, more or less, doing what he does best: trolling. Seriously though, this was a waste of a debate, and the topic actually wasn't too bad. Something is definitely wrong when the number of characters in a comment on a single vote can approximate the number of characters in the entire debate.
Vote Placed by Valkyrie 4 years ago
Valkyrie
abstractpostersmohammadTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: wow that wasnt exactly very in depth
Vote Placed by buckIPDA 4 years ago
buckIPDA
abstractpostersmohammadTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.