Vampires vs. werewolves
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Hardcore.Pwnography
| Started: | 2/20/2012 | Category: | Arts |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 561 times | Debate No: | 21300 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)
 Pro Arg. 1. Vampires are better because they don't need to eat food. Thus, they can live wherever they want so long as there are animals and humans. This being said, I rest my case that vampires are better because they have unlimited range of habitat.  Con Refutation Arg. 1. Vampires are better because they don't need to eat food. They must survive on blood, which is essentially food to them. Therefore, they still need sustenance. Thus, they can live wherever they want so long as there are animals and humans. This is a contradiction. The second half of the statement: "as long as there are animals and humans." contradicts the first, proving that they cannot live as long as they want. This being said, I rest my case that vampires are better because they have unlimited range of habitat. Not true. Vampires must live near cities or animals in order to get the blood they need to survive. Therefore, PRO is unable to prove anything. Arguments Contention 1: Not a serial killer Vampires must kill animals or humans ro survive, in essence, drinking their blood. This is inhumane and puts the vampire in a monstrous light. Werewolves are able to survive with humans and eat normally, so that they will not endanger animals or humans. As a result, Werewolves are better than vampires. Vote CON. |
 |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by kyro90 1 year ago
Report this Comment
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 1 year ago
| prettymuchpro | Hardcore.Pwnography | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious win is obvious?
Vote Placed by Xerge 1 year ago
| prettymuchpro | Hardcore.Pwnography | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con made far more compelling arguments than pro.
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 1 year ago
| prettymuchpro | Hardcore.Pwnography | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made this a one-round debate and really only provided one point that was not even true to make his case.
Vote Placed by TUF 1 year ago
| prettymuchpro | Hardcore.Pwnography | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro started this debate, putting himself in last place. Why make a 1 round debate with no big case? Free win for HCP/
Vote Placed by Viper-King 1 year ago
| prettymuchpro | Hardcore.Pwnography | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Suckish Debate. Pro made it 1 round so loses conduct. Con made better arguments barely though... Neither side had sources or better S