The Instigator
daartoe
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
qwzx
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Vegetarianism is an idea that should not have a religious binding.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open with Elo Restrictions Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/30/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 325 times Debate No: 72565
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)

 

daartoe

Pro

In this debate I am fully tolerant on the biblical evidence that you would push through. this is not my first round and I would gladly want to hear your background before we go on to debate.

vegetarianism - abstinence from meat for moral, and religious reasons.
religious binding - a creed or doctrine of a church or cult

this is not my first round and your first round must only be one as to show jus a background for the motion so that when we debate it'll be three rounds fairly.
qwzx

Con

"Vegetarianism is an idea that should not have a religious binding."

??????????????? So becoming a vegetarian is immoral and wrong?

I challenge that that theory.....

;)
Debate Round No. 1
daartoe

Pro

daartoe forfeited this round.
qwzx

Con

Why can't religion influence your decision? Is religion itself immoral?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Extend my arguments....Pro forfeited therefore I win by default.

VOTE ME

;)
Debate Round No. 2
daartoe

Pro

daartoe forfeited this round.
qwzx

Con

Why can't religion influence your decision? Is religion itself immoral?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Extend my arguments....Pro forfeited therefore I win by default.

VOTE ME
Debate Round No. 3
daartoe

Pro

daartoe forfeited this round.
qwzx

Con

Why can't religion influence your decision? Is religion itself immoral?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Extend my arguments....Pro forfeited therefore I win by default.

VOTE ME
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by GoOrDin 2 years ago
GoOrDin
Con trolled Pro. he looses by default.
Posted by GoOrDin 2 years ago
GoOrDin
PRO is correct. Being a vegetarian can be entirely health related. Therefor it does not have to be religious.

despite consideration for health is a religious principal and a spiritual (acceptance of theism) mandate,

because it can be in consideration for personal hygiene and be apart from consideration for ideals; it can be unbinded from religion.

Pro must win.

It is logical to present Con as a debate however, because religion/spirituality is a consideration for anything greater than oneself with respects to true moral conduct [ understanding our full knowledge of the universe and world around us is limited ( even slight consideration is a spiritual/religious statement ) ] - Cons argument*.
Posted by Mayura 2 years ago
Mayura
Wow nice topic! I am on your side.best of luck.yes its not good everybody should be free to choose what they wantvto eat .even eating vegetables doesn't mean you are good person they also have life.
Posted by 18Karl 2 years ago
18Karl
How about Hindu Vegetarianism?
No votes have been placed for this debate.