The Instigator
Pro (for)
1 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Vi_Spex's debates would be improved if he used logic other people understand and not just himself

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/13/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 542 times Debate No: 77628
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)




No semantics, kitriks, and grammar must be used. Also, I would appreciate the use common sense. First round is acceptance only.


I accept. I believe that vi_spex wouldn't improve in his debates if he used other peoples' logic.
Debate Round No. 1


To start, I want to clarify what meant by 'other people'. I meant logic that the general understands. Also, I meant logic as understanding of other people. If you find it unfair that I put new definitions here, than I automatically forfeit the debate to you.

In many debates, vi-spex ends up explaining his (I think it is a his) position, without any real arguments going on. Clearly, if people knew perfectly what vi-spex was talking about, the debates would focus on debating the subject.


vi_spex can still use logic. The main problem with him is simply that he never backs up his arguments using evidence. He always makes bare assertions.

Here is an example:

"Survival + Adaptation = Evolution"

What he's saying is logical and DOES make sense; however, he doesn't support this with any sort of reasoning or evidence. He always makes claims, but never tells you WHY they are right. This proves that he actually DOES use logic, but he fails to support why that's the case.
Debate Round No. 2


Logic is reasoning, to start.

Okay, the debate you posted isn't finished. So far, it seems that vi_spex was posting definitions in the first round. Vi_Spex, you can correct me.

Now, that is one debate. I will post a few debates where vi_spex's reasoning was not understood.

In these cases, vi_spex was arguing something or other, and the opponent misunderstood vi_spex's point because they couldn't understand what vi_spex wrote. Had he used arguments, there would be a much better debate.


lol101 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by dsjpk5 3 years ago
The man is a genius! We simply are not smart enough to fathom his brilliant ideas. Brilliant= Be real ant!
Posted by RoyalFlush100 3 years ago
lol does Pro even realize vi_spex's debates aren't meant to be taken seriously?
Posted by Rami 3 years ago
No, most people don't understand what you are saying. I know it makes perfect sense in your view, but for the rest of us, we don't know what you are trying to say. By the way, if you agree with me, that's an easy argument for me.
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
no. the issue if people dont know how to counter an argument
Posted by Rami 3 years ago
Perhaps of you cleaned up your grammar. Also, maybe you could type like you speak.
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
like how
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by CASmnl42 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct points for FF.