Vi_Spex's debates would be improved if he used logic other people understand and not just himself
Debate Rounds (3)
No semantics, kitriks, and grammar must be used. Also, I would appreciate the use common sense. First round is acceptance only.
In many debates, vi-spex ends up explaining his (I think it is a his) position, without any real arguments going on. Clearly, if people knew perfectly what vi-spex was talking about, the debates would focus on debating the subject.
Here is an example: http://www.debate.org...
"Survival + Adaptation = Evolution"
What he's saying is logical and DOES make sense; however, he doesn't support this with any sort of reasoning or evidence. He always makes claims, but never tells you WHY they are right. This proves that he actually DOES use logic, but he fails to support why that's the case.
Okay, the debate you posted isn't finished. So far, it seems that vi_spex was posting definitions in the first round. Vi_Spex, you can correct me.
Now, that is one debate. I will post a few debates where vi_spex's reasoning was not understood.
In these cases, vi_spex was arguing something or other, and the opponent misunderstood vi_spex's point because they couldn't understand what vi_spex wrote. Had he used arguments, there would be a much better debate.
lol101 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by CASmnl42 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct points for FF.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.