The Instigator
DQIXHero
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
hummus123
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Video Games

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
hummus123
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 953 times Debate No: 21467
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

DQIXHero

Pro

I think that kids should be allowed play on three and a half hours of video games a week. Remember, this is just a debate. Parents have to agree first before it really happens. Thanks and no spamming!
hummus123

Con

Well thanks for inviting me! I think kids should be able to play video games for 30 mins a week.
Debate Round No. 1
DQIXHero

Pro

OK... Kids should be able to play for a short amount of time. If this gets passed, people should only get it for an hour (maybe)
hummus123

Con

30 mins is all kids need to play video games. My cousin only plays his video games for 30 mins and he is a HUGE gamer. Even big gamers only need 30 mins to practice for gaming tournaments.
Debate Round No. 2
hummus123

Con

I guess were at an agrement. Nice (and stupid) debate!!
Debate Round No. 3
DQIXHero

Pro

No I just felt like saying 30 mins!
hummus123

Con

hummus123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
DQIXHero

Pro

Thanks for this debate![:-bd]

_________________________
I added cool smileys to this message... if you don't see them go to: http://s.exps.me...
hummus123

Con

hummus123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by communistman101 4 years ago
communistman101
In Soviet Russia, kids do not kill people in video games they do that in real life.
I had 32 kills in one day.
I guess you can call it multiplayer.
It wasn't Halo.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
DQIXHerohummus123Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Horrible debate. Pro trolled. Con forfeited. Arguments for con because of Pro not arguing.