Video games are for loser Nerds
Debate Rounds (5)
I contend that Video games are for stupid nerds with no life. Debate me if you desagree IMO
1. nerds dont get invited to parties
2. nerds dont get TANG
1. people who lose
Everyone KNOWS that people who play games dont win at anything ecept their world of wercraft bate champtionships. Clearly, no VICTORY, no PARTIES, no TANG = LOSER NERD IMO.
Having a life needs ONE thing SHOTS, TANG, a COLLAR shirt, and $$ in the BANK. Naerds are too busy playing anime MMOIMO's to win Anything!!!!
Video games are for people who lose and who do not get invited to parties. Nor do these individuals get TANG.
Given that video games tend to have a fail state, this also implies the possibility of victory, or a win state. Therein-by an individual who is deemed a loser has the potential to see victory by the nature of what a game is. It cannot be proved that anyone is without defeats before participating in a video game. This presents the possibility that both a loser and winner are capable of achieving a victory or a loss. This contradicts the notion that video games are only for people who tend to lose. This contradiction comes from the ability of winners to play a video game. If video games were in fact for losers, that would make it impossible for winners to even play.
By establishing that winners and losers are both capable of playing a video game, I have rendered the noun of nerd irrelevant in regards to your proposal. If video games were "for" a specific audience, it would be prominently displayed by those creating games who their intended audience is. It would also be of common knowledge to a wider public who this audience is. There is no such common understanding between persons that video games are intended to be played by nerds. To which you defined as those who do not get invited to parties or who do not get TANG. Common knowledge is not basis for conclusive findings or a statement of fact. It applies in this instance as the debate is one of the intended audience. By establishing that those outside the intended audience play video games, you can disprove the notion of your proposal.
Yeah sure but do they get TANG IMO?
If one were to say a nerd gets zero TANG, that would meet your definition. Now if that person were to play a video game, that does not necessarily make the game one that caters to this nerd and his lack of TANG. The ability of those who do get TANG to play video games, disproves the idea that they are only for those who are TANGless.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, this is where you mess up. You have fallen into my logic trap.
You see, ONLY Nerds play video games, so cool kids like me dont play video games because they are too busy playing BOOTY games. IMO this article for evidence of statistic http://hubpages.com...
Therefore, if all but nerds get booty and are too busy earning cash and booty to play stupid games, that means the only people left with time to play video games are filthy nerds.
MaxDong forfeited this round.
swagasaurus forfeited this round.
MaxDong forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by U.n 8 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Only Pro cited a source. Con forfeited more turns.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.