The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Violence is not an effective method to ensure peace.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
RonPaulConservative has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/27/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 month ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 119 times Debate No: 96451
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Throughout history, people have relied on wars and violence in order to resolve issues, whether it be for profit or satisfaction in other ways. As of now, it is culturally acceptable, in certain circumstances to use violence in order to resolve issues for a supposed peaceful endpoint that "justifies the means". My argument is that violence only perpetuates more violence, and in order to mitigate it, we must create new alternatives and change our ideology that has been ingrained through social conditioning.


We didn't win WW2 with appeasement, we won it with guns.
Debate Round No. 1


Each war that was created was created without consideration to alternative and better means in order to resolve conflict and ultimately obtain peace in a more ideal and sustainable way.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.