Violence is not necassry to change the government
Debate Rounds (3)
Basically, there is no particular action that would alter the government- much more violence alone. But somehow, violence would make the government respond to its external environment. They wouldn"t hasten whatever tactics and actions they would make without an "obvious" prevailing problem. So I think, violence could somehow be responsible in changing the government.
username2191 forfeited this round.
AizenKnaik forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Seeginomikata 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: Con made better argument, had more relevant points
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.